1996 Peugeot 106 MPG is between 21 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Peugeot 106 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Peugeot 106 MPG is up to 44% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.4 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 i |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 i |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.3 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 D |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 S16 |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.4 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.3 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
55 MPG
(6.9 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 S16 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Peugeot 106 MPG is between 30 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Peugeot 106 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Peugeot 106 MPG is up to 53% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 D |
40
/
57 MPG
(5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 D |
43
/
62 MPG
(5.5 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.4 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
57 MPG
(5.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
43
/
62 MPG
(5.5 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |