2005 Opel Tigra MPG is between 22 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Opel Tigra MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Opel Tigra MPG is up to 60% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 CDTI |
41
/
60 MPG
(5.8 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4i 16V ECOTEC |
29
/
48 MPG
(8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V ECOTEC |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 CDTI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
60 MPG
(5.8 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i 16V ECOTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
48 MPG
(8 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V ECOTEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.9 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Opel Tigra MPG is between 22 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Opel Tigra MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Opel Tigra MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 16V |
22
/
43 MPG
(10.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V |
24
/
40 MPG
(9.8 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
43 MPG
(10.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
40 MPG
(9.8 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.6 L per 100 km / person |