1982 Opel Rekord MPG is between 16 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1982 Opel Rekord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1982 Opel Rekord MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 D |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 S |
16
/
23 MPG
(15 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 S |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 E |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 E |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 TD |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
23 MPG
(15 / 10.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.7 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.2 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1982 Opel Rekord MPG is between 22 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1982 Opel Rekord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1982 Opel Rekord MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 E |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 D |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 S |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 E |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 S |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 D |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i CAT |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 TD |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 E |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i CAT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1978 Opel Rekord MPG is between 20 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 1978 Opel Rekord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1978 Opel Rekord MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 E |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 S |
24
/
31 MPG
(10 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 D |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 D |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
31 MPG
(10 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1978 Opel Rekord MPG is between 19 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1978 Opel Rekord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1978 Opel Rekord MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 S |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 D |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 E |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 D |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 S |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 E |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1972 Opel Rekord MPG is between 18 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 1972 Opel Rekord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1972 Opel Rekord MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 S |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 S |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 D |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.8 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1972 Opel Rekord MPG is between 17 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 1972 Opel Rekord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1972 Opel Rekord MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 S |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 S |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.1 D |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 S |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.1 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.3 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1972 Opel Rekord MPG is between 16 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 1972 Opel Rekord MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1972 Opel Rekord MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 S |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
24
/
33 MPG
(10 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 S |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 S |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(10 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |