cat_logo
HomeOldsmobile

Cutlass

Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG by Years

Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG

    • average 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 20 MPG / 12.7 L per 100 km
    • worst 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 15 MPG / 16 L per 100 km
    • best 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 26 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1490 kg / 3285 lbs
    • body type: sedan
    • difference highway / city: 39%
    • average engine power: 127 kW / 172 hp
    • difference from world average: 37% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 313 miles (504 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is between 15 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.4 V6 — 15 to 24 MPG
  • 3.1 V6 — 15 to 26 MPG
  • 2.3 16V — 15 to 26 MPG


    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio

    The 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.4 V6 — 88 kg/mpg
  • 3.1 V6 — 76 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 16V — 78 kg/mpg


    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.4 V6 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 3.1 V6 is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 16V is 41% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.4 V6 15 / 24 MPG
    (16 / 10 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    3.1 V6 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 16V 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme MPG

    Vehicle 3.4 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 24 MPG
    (16 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.1 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG

      • average 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 20 MPG / 12.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 15 MPG / 16 L per 100 km
      • best 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 26 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1697 kg / 3742 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 39%
      • average engine power: 127 kW / 172 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 373 miles (600 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is between 15 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.3 16V — 15 to 26 MPG
  • 3.1 V6 — 15 to 26 MPG
  • 3.4 V6 — 15 to 24 MPG


    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio

    The 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.3 16V — 86 kg/mpg
  • 3.1 V6 — 86 kg/mpg
  • 3.4 V6 — 77 kg/mpg


    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.3 16V is 41% less economical than average car
  • 3.1 V6 is 41% less economical than average car
  • 3.4 V6 is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Convertible MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.3 16V 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km / person
    3.1 V6 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    3.4 V6 15 / 24 MPG
    (16 / 10 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Convertible MPG

    Vehicle 2.3 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.1 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.4 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 24 MPG
    (16 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG

      • average 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 20 MPG / 12.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 15 MPG / 16 L per 100 km
      • best 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 26 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1445 kg / 3186 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 39%
      • average engine power: 127 kW / 172 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 313 miles (504 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is between 15 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.1 V6 — 15 to 26 MPG
  • 2.3 16 — 15 to 26 MPG
  • 3.4 V6 — 15 to 24 MPG


    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio

    The 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.1 V6 — 76 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 16 — 76 kg/mpg
  • 3.4 V6 — 80 kg/mpg


    1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.1 V6 is 41% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 16 is 41% less economical than average car
  • 3.4 V6 is 44% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Coupe MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.1 V6 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 16 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    3.4 V6 15 / 24 MPG
    (16 / 10 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Coupe MPG

    Vehicle 3.1 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 16
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 26 MPG
    (16 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.4 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 24 MPG
    (16 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG

      • average 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 20 MPG / 11.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 16 MPG / 15 L per 100 km
      • best 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 29 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1200 kg / 2646 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 105 kW / 143 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 288 miles (464 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is between 16 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.5 i — 17 to 29 MPG
  • 2.3 16V — 16 to 26 MPG
  • 3.3 V6 — 16 to 26 MPG


    1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio

    The 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.5 i — 56 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 16V — 63 kg/mpg
  • 3.3 V6 — 60 kg/mpg


    1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.5 i is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 16V is 41% less economical than average car
  • 3.3 V6 is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.5 i 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 16V 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9.2 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 186—373 miles
    (300—600 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    3.3 V6 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 186—373 miles
    (300—600 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais MPG

    Vehicle 2.5 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—373 miles (300—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.3 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—373 miles (300—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG

      • average 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 20 MPG / 11.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 16 MPG / 15 L per 100 km
      • best 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 29 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1160 kg / 2558 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 105 kW / 143 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 288 miles (464 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is between 16 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.5 i — 17 to 29 MPG
  • 2.3 16V — 16 to 26 MPG
  • 3.3 V6 — 16 to 26 MPG


    1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio

    The 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.5 i — 55 kg/mpg
  • 2.3 16V — 58 kg/mpg
  • 3.3 V6 — 58 kg/mpg


    1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.5 i is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.3 16V is 37% less economical than average car
  • 3.3 V6 is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais Coupe MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.5 i 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.3 16V 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 186—373 miles
    (300—600 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    3.3 V6 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 186—373 miles
    (300—600 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais Coupe MPG

    Vehicle 2.5 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 29 MPG
    (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.3 16V
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—373 miles (300—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.3 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—373 miles (300—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG

      • average 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 21 MPG / 10.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 16 MPG / 15 L per 100 km
      • best 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 34 MPG / 6.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1392 kg / 3069 lbs
      • body type: sedan
      • difference highway / city: 35%
      • average engine power: 102 kW / 138 hp
      • difference from world average: 34% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 455 miles (733 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is between 16 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.2 i — 24 to 34 MPG
  • 2.5 i — 17 to 26 MPG
  • 3.3 V6 — 16 to 26 MPG
  • 3.1 V6 — 19 to 28 MPG


    1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio

    The 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.2 i — 49 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 i — 64 kg/mpg
  • 3.3 V6 — 64 kg/mpg
  • 3.1 V6 — 63 kg/mpg


    1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.2 i is 16% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 i is 37% less economical than average car
  • 3.3 V6 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 3.1 V6 is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.2 i 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 i 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    3.3 V6 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    3.1 V6 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera MPG

    Vehicle 2.2 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.3 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 26 MPG
    (15 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.1 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG

      • average 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 20 MPG / 11.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 17 MPG / 14 L per 100 km
      • best 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: 26 MPG / 9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1385 kg / 3054 lbs
      • body type: station wagon (estate)
      • difference highway / city: 35%
      • average engine power: 99 kW / 134 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 319 miles (513 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is between 17 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.5 i — 17 to 26 MPG
  • 3.3 V6 — 17 to 26 MPG


    1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio

    The 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.5 i — 68 kg/mpg
  • 3.3 V6 — 69 kg/mpg


    1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.5 i is 37% less economical than average car
  • 3.3 V6 is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera Station Wagon MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.5 i 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    3.3 V6 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera Station Wagon MPG

    Vehicle 2.5 i
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.3 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 26 MPG
    (14 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings