2014 Nissan Patrol MPG is 21 MPG on engine:
The 2014 Nissan Patrol MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 Nissan Patrol MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.6 V8 |
11
/
21 MPG
(20.6 / 11 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.6 V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
21 MPG
(20.6 / 11 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Nissan Patrol MPG is between 12 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Nissan Patrol MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Nissan Patrol MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 TD |
12
/
21 MPG
(20 / 11 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 Di |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 Di 16V |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.9 / 9 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 GR |
16
/
26 MPG
(15 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
12
/
21 MPG
(20 / 11 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 Di |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
31 MPG
(12 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 Di 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.9 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 GR |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
26 MPG
(15 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |