2017 Nissan Note MPG is between 48 MPG and 87 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Nissan Note MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Nissan Note MPG is up to 116% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 |
48
/
69 MPG
(4.9 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
| e-POWER 1.2 |
60
/
87 MPG
(3.9 / 2.7 L per 100 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 116% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
| 1.2 DIG-S |
53
/
78 MPG
(4.4 / 3 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 93% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.2 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
69 MPG
(4.9 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | e-POWER 1.2 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
60
/
87 MPG
(3.9 / 2.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 3.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 116% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.2 DIG-S |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
53
/
78 MPG
(4.4 / 3 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 93% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Nissan Note MPG is between 38 MPG and 74 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Nissan Note MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Nissan Note MPG is up to 103% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 DIG-S |
38
/
52 MPG
(6.2 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
-
|
1 L per 100 km / person |
| 1.5 dCi |
56
/
74 MPG
(4.2 / 3.2 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 103% better |
-
|
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
| 1.2 |
40
/
59 MPG
(5.9 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
-
|
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.2 DIG-S |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
52 MPG
(6.2 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
56
/
74 MPG
(4.2 / 3.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 103% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.2 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
59 MPG
(5.9 / 4 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Nissan Note MPG is between 25 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Nissan Note MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Nissan Note MPG is up to 75% better than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4 |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.3 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
| 1.5 dCi |
47
/
64 MPG
(5 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
| 1.6 |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
46 MPG
(7.3 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
47
/
64 MPG
(5 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
