2015 Nissan Navara MPG is 39 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Nissan Navara MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Nissan Navara MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 dCi |
34
/
39 MPG
(7 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
684—808 miles
(1100—1300 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
39 MPG
(7 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—808 miles (1100—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Nissan Navara MPG is 39 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Nissan Navara MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Nissan Navara MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 dCi |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.7 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.7 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Nissan Navara MPG is between 19 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Nissan Navara MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Nissan Navara MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 dCi |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 dCi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.6 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.7 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |