2017 Nissan Micra MPG is between 37 MPG and 76 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Nissan Micra MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Nissan Micra MPG is up to 132% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
- | 60% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 dCi |
67
/
76 MPG
(3.5 / 3.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 132% better |
746—808 miles
(1200—1300 km) |
0.6 L per 100 km / person |
0.9 IG-T |
39
/
51 MPG
(6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 IG |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 IG-T |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 63% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 DIG-T |
39
/
56 MPG
(6.1 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
62 MPG
(5.8 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
67
/
76 MPG
(3.5 / 3.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 132% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—808 miles (1200—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.9 IG-T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
51 MPG
(6 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 IG |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.3 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 IG-T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
60 MPG
(5.6 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 63% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 DIG-T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
56 MPG
(6.1 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Nissan Micra MPG is 55 MPG on engine:
The 2013 Nissan Micra MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Nissan Micra MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
39
/
55 MPG
(6.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
-
|
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
55 MPG
(6.1 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Nissan Micra MPG is between 35 MPG and 64 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Nissan Micra MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Nissan Micra MPG is up to 78% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 DIG-S |
45
/
64 MPG
(5.2 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 78% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 DIG-S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
64 MPG
(5.2 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 78% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Nissan Micra MPG is between 29 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Nissan Micra MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Nissan Micra MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.5 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.4 |
29
/
45 MPG
(8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.3i 16V |
34
/
45 MPG
(6.9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.0i 16V |
33
/
45 MPG
(7.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.5 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
45 MPG
(8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
45 MPG
(6.9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
45 MPG
(7.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |