2003 Nissan March MPG is between 27 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Nissan March MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Nissan March MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 i 16V |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.6 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.2 i 16V |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.6 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.2 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Nissan March MPG is between 29 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Nissan March MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Nissan March MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 |
29
/
45 MPG
(8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.0i 16V |
33
/
45 MPG
(7.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.3i 16V |
34
/
45 MPG
(6.9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.0 |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.5 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
45 MPG
(8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
45 MPG
(7.1 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
45 MPG
(6.9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.5 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |