1999 Nissan Cedric MPG is between 17 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Nissan Cedric MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Nissan Cedric MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5T |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.9 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.0i V6 |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.9 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Nissan Cedric MPG is between 16 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Nissan Cedric MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Nissan Cedric MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.5 / 10.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i V6 |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.8d |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.8 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i V6 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.0i V6 |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0T V6 |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.8 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.5 / 10.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
30 MPG
(11.3 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.8 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0T V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
23 MPG
(14.8 / 10.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Nissan Cedric MPG is between 17 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Nissan Cedric MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Nissan Cedric MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0i V6 |
17
/
29 MPG
(14.2 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i V6 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.8 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(14.2 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.8 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Nissan Cedric MPG is 33 MPG on engine:
The 1992 Nissan Cedric MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Nissan Cedric MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8d |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8d |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Nissan Cedric MPG is between 18 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Nissan Cedric MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Nissan Cedric MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
-
|
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i V6 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.8d |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.0i V6 |
18
/
28 MPG
(13.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
28 MPG
(13.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1987 Nissan Cedric MPG is between 18 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 1987 Nissan Cedric MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1987 Nissan Cedric MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i V6 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0i V6 |
18
/
28 MPG
(13.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.8d |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
28 MPG
(13.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |