2006 Nissan Bluebird MPG is between 22 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Nissan Bluebird MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Nissan Bluebird MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5i |
29
/
42 MPG
(8.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
42 MPG
(8.1 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Nissan Bluebird MPG is between 25 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Nissan Bluebird MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Nissan Bluebird MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.5i |
30
/
42 MPG
(7.9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
42 MPG
(7.9 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Nissan Bluebird MPG is between 17 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Nissan Bluebird MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Nissan Bluebird MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 XE Attesa |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.3 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0d |
32
/
44 MPG
(7.4 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 Le grand |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 SSS-Z |
17
/
31 MPG
(13.7 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
-
|
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 Eprise |
26
/
39 MPG
(9.2 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 SSS |
20
/
33 MPG
(12 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
-
|
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 FE |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 SSS Limited |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
-
|
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 XE Attesa |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.3 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
44 MPG
(7.4 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 Le grand |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SSS-Z |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(13.7 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 Eprise |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9.2 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SSS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(12 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 FE |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SSS Limited |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.5 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1987 Nissan Bluebird MPG is between 32 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
We calculated that 1987 Nissan Bluebird MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 SSS |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 SSS |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 SSS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SSS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
47 MPG
(7.4 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |