1998 Nissan Avenir MPG is between 16 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Nissan Avenir MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Nissan Avenir MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT4 2.0i 16V |
16
/
27 MPG
(15 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT4 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(15 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Nissan Avenir MPG is between 20 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Nissan Avenir MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Nissan Avenir MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |