2020 Nissan Almera MPG is 69 MPG on engine:
The 2020 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 75% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 Turbo |
49
/
69 MPG
(4.8 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 75% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
69 MPG
(4.8 / 3.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 75% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Nissan Almera MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
The 2013 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.9 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.9 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Nissan Almera MPG is between 18 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
18
/
33 MPG
(12.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 Di |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.3 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
33 MPG
(12.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 Di |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Nissan Almera MPG is between 22 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 2003 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 25% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 d |
29
/
50 MPG
(8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 d |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
50 MPG
(8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Nissan Almera MPG is 38 MPG on engine:
The 2000 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 6% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Nissan Almera MPG is between 22 MPG and 38 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 6% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.6 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Nissan Almera MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
The 2000 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Nissan Almera MPG is 41 MPG on engine:
The 1995 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 SLX |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 SLX |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Nissan Almera MPG is 44 MPG on engine:
The 1995 Nissan Almera MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Nissan Almera MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 SR,SLX |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 SR,SLX |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.6 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |