2015 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is 27 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 DI-DC |
22
/
27 MPG
(10.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 DI-DC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
27 MPG
(10.5 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is 31 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 13% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 DI-DC |
23
/
31 MPG
(10.1 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 DI-DC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
31 MPG
(10.1 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is 37 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 2008 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 6% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 TD |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 6% worse |
-
|
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is between 13 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 Di-DC |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.8 i V6 24V MIVEC |
13
/
21 MPG
(17.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 Di-DC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 i V6 24V MIVEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
21 MPG
(17.7 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is between 14 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 GDI |
14
/
22 MPG
(16.9 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 DI-D |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 TD |
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 GDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
22 MPG
(16.9 / 10.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 DI-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
30 MPG
(12.4 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is between 19 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GDI 16V |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.2 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 GDI |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.1 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDI 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
29 MPG
(12.2 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11.1 / 7.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is 45 MPG on engine:
The 1998 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V GDI 4WD |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.69 / 5.19 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V GDI 4WD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
45 MPG
(7.69 / 5.19 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is between 14 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 i V6 24V |
14
/
24 MPG
(16.6 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 TD |
17
/
27 MPG
(13.8 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 TD |
21
/
25 MPG
(11 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
24 MPG
(16.6 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
27 MPG
(13.8 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
25 MPG
(11 / 9.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is 47 MPG on engine:
The 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1 |
26
/
47 MPG
(9 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
47 MPG
(9 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is between 26 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.7 20V Turbo |
26
/
59 MPG
(9 / 4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
0.7 16V |
34
/
59 MPG
(7 / 4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.7 20V Turbo |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
59 MPG
(9 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 0.7 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
59 MPG
(7 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is between 13 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 24V |
14
/
20 MPG
(16.7 / 11.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V |
15
/
21 MPG
(16 / 11.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 GLS |
15
/
21 MPG
(16.1 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 TD GLX |
15
/
24 MPG
(15.2 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 TD GL |
18
/
27 MPG
(13 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V GLS |
14
/
22 MPG
(17.2 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 i V6 24V GLS |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.2 / 11.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 i V6 24V GDI |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
20 MPG
(16.7 / 11.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
21 MPG
(16 / 11.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 GLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
21 MPG
(16.1 / 11.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 TD GLX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
24 MPG
(15.2 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD GL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V GLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
22 MPG
(17.2 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V GLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
21 MPG
(18.2 / 11.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
1991 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is between 13 MPG and 25 MPG depending on engine:
The 1991 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1991 Mitsubishi Pajero MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 i V6 24V |
14
/
21 MPG
(16.3 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V GLS |
14
/
22 MPG
(17.2 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 TD GL |
18
/
22 MPG
(13 / 10.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 TD GLS |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 i V6 24V GDI |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 i V6 24V GLS |
13
/
22 MPG
(17.8 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
21 MPG
(16.3 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V GLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
22 MPG
(17.2 / 10.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD GL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
22 MPG
(13 / 10.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 TD GLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
25 MPG
(13.5 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V GLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
22 MPG
(17.8 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |