2018 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is between 24 MPG and 181 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is up to 357% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 PHEV |
131
/
181 MPG
(1.8 / 1.3 L per 100 km) |
11.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 357% better |
1553—2175 miles
(2500—3500 km) |
0.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 MIVEC |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 PHEV |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
131
/
181 MPG
(1.8 / 1.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 11.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 357% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 1553—2175 miles (2500—3500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 MIVEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is between 20 MPG and 168 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is up to 333% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MIVEC |
118
/
168 MPG
(2 / 1.4 L per 100 km) |
10.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 333% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
0.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 DI-D |
34
/
45 MPG
(6.9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 MIVEC |
24
/
36 MPG
(9.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
GT 3.0 MIVEC V6 |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 MIVEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
118
/
168 MPG
(2 / 1.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 10.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 333% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 DI-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
45 MPG
(6.9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
36 MPG
(9.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 3.0 MIVEC V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is between 20 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 MIVEC |
25
/
31 MPG
(9.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 MIVEC V6 |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 MIVEC |
29
/
41 MPG
(8 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 |
33
/
46 MPG
(7.1 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 MIVEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
31 MPG
(9.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 MIVEC V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 MIVEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
46 MPG
(7.1 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is between 15 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 DI-D |
26
/
37 MPG
(9 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.4i |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V XL |
15
/
29 MPG
(15.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI-D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V XL |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
29 MPG
(15.9 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is between 17 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Mitsubishi Outlander MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V 4WD |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V 4WD |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
17
/
31 MPG
(14.1 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4i AWD |
21
/
26 MPG
(11.2 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i 16V 4WD XLS |
21
/
26 MPG
(11.2 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V 4WD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
31 MPG
(12.4 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(14.1 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4i AWD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
26 MPG
(11.2 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V 4WD XLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
26 MPG
(11.2 / 9.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |