Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 23 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 |
23
/
31 MPG
(10.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 MIVEC |
34
/
50 MPG
(7 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.8 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
31 MPG
(10.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 MIVEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
50 MPG
(7 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 27 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
34
/
50 MPG
(7 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.6 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
50 MPG
(7 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 22 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 MIVEC |
32
/
50 MPG
(7.4 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5i |
29
/
44 MPG
(8.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 DI-D |
29
/
48 MPG
(8.2 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Ralliart 2.0 |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 MIVEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
50 MPG
(7.4 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
44 MPG
(8.2 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.4 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
48 MPG
(8.2 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Ralliart 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 21 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 MPI |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 |
28
/
42 MPG
(8.3 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 13% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 DI-D |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.3 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 MPI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
42 MPG
(8.3 / 5.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
46 MPG
(8.3 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 16 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i 16V |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.3i 16V |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 2.0i 16V |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Evolution 2.0 |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.6 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.5 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
36 MPG
(11.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.6 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 20 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 1.6i 16V |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 2.0i 16V |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 1.6i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(11.7 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 15 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evolution 2.0 T |
15
/
28 MPG
(15.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Evolution 2.0i 16V |
15
/
28 MPG
(15.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
28 MPG
(15.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
28 MPG
(15.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is 28 MPG on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evolution 2.0 T |
15
/
28 MPG
(15.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Evolution 2.0 T |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
28 MPG
(15.4 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is 43 MPG on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 0% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 12V GL,GLX |
26
/
43 MPG
(9.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 12V GL,GLX |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(9.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 28 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Diesel |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Diesel |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 25 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
48 MPG
(7 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 16 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 12V |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 12V |
27
/
48 MPG
(8.6 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
16
/
29 MPG
(15 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
186—373 miles
(300—600 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
GTi 1.8 16V |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.1 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 12V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
48 MPG
(8.6 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(15 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—373 miles (300—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
33 MPG
(11.9 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GTi 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.1 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 21 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 12V |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 12V |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 Diesel |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.5 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.1 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 12V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 Diesel |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
51 MPG
(6.5 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.1 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is between 20 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that Lancer Mitsubishi Lancer MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 D |
33
/
50 MPG
(7.1 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
50 MPG
(7.1 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |