2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is 39 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d |
29
/
39 MPG
(8.2 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
39 MPG
(8.2 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is 39 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d |
29
/
39 MPG
(8.2 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
39 MPG
(8.2 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4d |
26
/
36 MPG
(9.1 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4d |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
36 MPG
(9.1 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is between 26 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 HP DI-D |
26
/
34 MPG
(9.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 DI-D |
26
/
35 MPG
(8.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 HP DI-D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
34 MPG
(9.1 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 DI-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
35 MPG
(8.9 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |