2004 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is between 17 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Mitsubishi Galant MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8 V6 |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 i 16V |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(13.5 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is between 18 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Mitsubishi Galant MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 24V |
18
/
35 MPG
(13 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 GDi 16V |
20
/
35 MPG
(12 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 GDI |
21
/
38 MPG
(11.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDI |
29
/
39 MPG
(8 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V GTZ |
20
/
27 MPG
(12 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
35 MPG
(13 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDi 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
35 MPG
(12 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
38 MPG
(11.4 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
39 MPG
(8 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V GTZ |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(12 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is between 19 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Mitsubishi Galant MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 V6-24 |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 GLSI |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 GLSTD |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 V6-24 4x4 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 V6-24 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLSI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLSTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6-24 4x4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is between 15 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Mitsubishi Galant MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 V6-24 |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 GLSI |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 24 V V6 T |
15
/
29 MPG
(16 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 GLSTD |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 V6-24 4x4 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 V6-24 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLSI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 24 V V6 T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
29 MPG
(16 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GLSTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6-24 4x4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.1 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is between 18 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Mitsubishi Galant MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TDI |
29
/
39 MPG
(8 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 GDI |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 24V |
18
/
35 MPG
(13 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.4 GDi 16V |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
39 MPG
(8 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.4 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
35 MPG
(13 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDi 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1984 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is 40 MPG on engine:
The 1984 Mitsubishi Galant MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1984 Mitsubishi Galant MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 GLX |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.1 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 GLX |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.1 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |