2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is between 16 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8L V6 MIVEC |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km / person |
GS 2.4L |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.4 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GS 2.4L |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.4 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is between 16 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4L |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4L |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.1 L per 100 km / person |
2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is 27 MPG on engine:
The 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTS 3.0 i V6 24V |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
5.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GTS 3.0 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5.2 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is between 20 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS 2.4 i 16V |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
4.6 L per 100 km / person |
GT 3.0 i V6 24V |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
5.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GS 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
30 MPG
(10.2 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 3.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
27 MPG
(11.8 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5.2 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is between 20 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V |
23
/
31 MPG
(10.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
4.5 L per 100 km / person |
GT 3.0 i V6 24V |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
5.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
31 MPG
(10.2 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 3.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5.1 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is between 16 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
21
/
41 MPG
(11.1 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo 16V |
16
/
31 MPG
(15 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
4.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
41 MPG
(11.1 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(15 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.5 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is between 17 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:
The 1990 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Mitsubishi Eclipse MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
24
/
39 MPG
(10 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
5.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V |
17
/
37 MPG
(14 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
39 MPG
(10 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 5.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
37 MPG
(14 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4 L per 100 km / person |