1995 Mitsubishi Diamante MPG is between 17 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Mitsubishi Diamante MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Mitsubishi Diamante MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 i V6 24V GDI 4WD |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.5 i V6 24V |
17
/
26 MPG
(14 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V GDI |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V GDI 4WD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(14 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
29 MPG
(14 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Mitsubishi Diamante MPG is between 22 MPG and 40 MPG depending on engine:
The 1990 Mitsubishi Diamante MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Mitsubishi Diamante MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i V6 24V |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i V6 24V 4WD |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V 4WD |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
40 MPG
(8.5 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.7 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(10 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |