2006 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is between 26 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Mitsubishi Colt MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 i 16V |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
3.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i 16V T |
26
/
40 MPG
(8.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V T |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
40 MPG
(8.9 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is between 27 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Mitsubishi Colt MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is up to 60% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 12V DI-D |
40
/
60 MPG
(5.9 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 60% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i 16V |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V CZ3 |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.7 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 CZ2 |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 i 12 V CZ3 |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 CZ1 |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.1 i 12V |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 DI-D |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 DI-D CZ3 |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 DI-D HP |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i 16V CZ3 |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i 16V CZT |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 12V DI-D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
40
/
60 MPG
(5.9 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 60% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V CZ3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
47 MPG
(7.7 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 CZ2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
49 MPG
(7.4 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 i 12 V CZ3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 CZ1 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.1 i 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 DI-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 DI-D CZ3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 DI-D HP |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V CZ3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
46 MPG
(8 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V CZT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
41 MPG
(8.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is between 22 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Mitsubishi Colt MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600 GLX |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.8 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V GLS |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V |
26
/
43 MPG
(9.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1300 GL,GLX |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1600 GLX |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.8 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V GLS |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
34 MPG
(10.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(9.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1300 GL,GLX |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is between 28 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Mitsubishi Colt MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 GLXi 16V |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 GLi 12V |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 GLXi 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 GLi 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1988 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is between 21 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 1988 Mitsubishi Colt MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1988 Mitsubishi Colt MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 DOHC |
24
/
36 MPG
(10 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 GTi 16V |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.1 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 DOHC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
36 MPG
(10 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 GTi 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11.1 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |