1995 Mitsubishi Carisma MPG is between 23 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Mitsubishi Carisma MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Mitsubishi Carisma MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
26
/
45 MPG
(9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.1 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V GDI |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 DI-D |
32
/
53 MPG
(7.3 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TD |
29
/
49 MPG
(8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
45 MPG
(9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.1 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 DI-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
53 MPG
(7.3 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
49 MPG
(8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Mitsubishi Carisma MPG is between 23 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 1995 Mitsubishi Carisma MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Mitsubishi Carisma MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V GDI |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.1 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V |
26
/
45 MPG
(9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 TD |
29
/
49 MPG
(8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.9 DI-D |
33
/
53 MPG
(7.1 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
497—870 miles
(800—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V GDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
45 MPG
(8.6 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
44 MPG
(8.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.1 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
45 MPG
(9 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
49 MPG
(8 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 DI-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
53 MPG
(7.1 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—870 miles (800—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |