2017 MG ZS MPG is between 29 MPG and 49 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 MG ZS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 MG ZS MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 T GDI |
29
/
45 MPG
(8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.0 T GDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
45 MPG
(8.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(6.9 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2001 MG ZS MPG is between 17 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 MG ZS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 MG ZS MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDi |
30
/
55 MPG
(7.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 V6 24V |
17
/
35 MPG
(14.1 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
55 MPG
(7.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
35 MPG
(14.1 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2001 MG ZS MPG is between 17 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 MG ZS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 MG ZS MPG is up to 31% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 TDi |
30
/
55 MPG
(7.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
435—808 miles
(700—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 V6 24V |
17
/
35 MPG
(14.1 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
41 MPG
(9.7 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
55 MPG
(7.8 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—808 miles (700—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
35 MPG
(14.1 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |