Mercedes-Benz ML MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Mercedes-Benz ML MPG by Years

Mercedes-Benz ML MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz ML MPG

    • average 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 26 MPG / 9.9 L per 100 km
    • worst 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 15 MPG / 15.7 L per 100 km
    • best 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 41 MPG / 5.7 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 2235 kg / 4928 lbs
    • body type: SUV
    • difference highway / city: 33%
    • average engine power: 261 kW / 355 hp
    • difference from world average: 19% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 932 miles (1500 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG is between 15 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:

  • ML 400 — 20 to 30 MPG
  • ML 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC — 33 to 41 MPG
  • ML 350 — 21 to 32 MPG
  • AMG ML 63 — 15 to 25 MPG
  • ML 500 — 15 to 25 MPG

    2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG to weight ratio

    The 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • ML 400 — 82 kg/mpg
  • ML 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC — 57 kg/mpg
  • ML 350 — 79 kg/mpg
  • AMG ML 63 — 117 kg/mpg
  • ML 500 — 112 kg/mpg

    2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG is up to 19% better than the world average consumption.

  • ML 400 is 19% less economical than average car
  • ML 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC is 19% more economical than average car
  • ML 350 is 16% less economical than average car
  • AMG ML 63 is 37% less economical than average car
  • ML 500 is 37% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (W166) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    ML 400 20 / 30 MPG
    (11.5 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    ML 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC 33 / 41 MPG
    (7.1 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% better 621—746 miles
    (1000—1200 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km / person
    ML 350 21 / 32 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    AMG ML 63 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.7 / 9.6 L per 100 km)
    2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km / person
    ML 500 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.2 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (W166) MPG

    Vehicle ML 400
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 30 MPG
    (11.5 / 7.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 250 BlueTEC 4MATIC
    Consumption (city / highway) 33 / 41 MPG
    (7.1 / 5.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 350
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 32 MPG
    (11.3 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle AMG ML 63
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.7 / 9.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 500
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 25 MPG
    (15.2 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz ML MPG

      • average 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 22 MPG / 12.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 10 MPG / 24.1 L per 100 km
      • best 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 35 MPG / 6.7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2240 kg / 4939 lbs
      • body type: off-road vehicle
      • difference highway / city: 38%
      • average engine power: 228 kW / 311 hp
      • difference from world average: 31% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 679 miles (1092 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG is between 10 MPG and 35 MPG depending on engine:

  • ML 280 CDI — 22 to 31 MPG
  • ML 420 CDI — 16 to 26 MPG
  • ML 350 BlueTEC — 20 to 35 MPG
  • ML 320 CDI — 22 to 31 MPG
  • ML 500 — 16 to 22 MPG
  • ML 350 — 16 to 24 MPG
  • ML 500 4Matic — 13 to 24 MPG
  • ML 550 — 13 to 24 MPG
  • AMG ML 63 — 10 to 19 MPG

    2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG to weight ratio

    The 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • ML 280 CDI — 84 kg/mpg
  • ML 420 CDI — 110 kg/mpg
  • ML 350 BlueTEC — 81 kg/mpg
  • ML 320 CDI — 84 kg/mpg
  • ML 500 — 117 kg/mpg
  • ML 350 — 103 kg/mpg
  • ML 500 4Matic — 121 kg/mpg
  • ML 550 — 121 kg/mpg
  • AMG ML 63 — 172 kg/mpg

    2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG is up to 60% worse than the world average consumption.

  • ML 280 CDI is 22% less economical than average car
  • ML 420 CDI is 34% less economical than average car
  • ML 350 BlueTEC is 16% less economical than average car
  • ML 320 CDI is 22% less economical than average car
  • ML 500 is 44% less economical than average car
  • ML 350 is 37% less economical than average car
  • ML 500 4Matic is 44% less economical than average car
  • ML 550 is 44% less economical than average car
  • AMG ML 63 is 60% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (W164) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    ML 280 CDI 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    ML 420 CDI 16 / 26 MPG
    (14.4 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    ML 350 BlueTEC 20 / 35 MPG
    (11.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 497—870 miles
    (800—1400 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    ML 320 CDI 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)
    1.9 L per 100 km / person
    ML 500 16 / 22 MPG
    (15.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.6 L per 100 km / person
    ML 350 16 / 24 MPG
    (14.5 / 10 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km / person
    ML 500 4Matic 13 / 24 MPG
    (17.6 / 10 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)
    2.6 L per 100 km / person
    ML 550 13 / 24 MPG
    (17.6 / 10 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)
    2.6 L per 100 km / person
    AMG ML 63 10 / 19 MPG
    (24.1 / 12.2 L per 100 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 60% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)
    2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (W164) MPG

    Vehicle ML 280 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 420 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 26 MPG
    (14.4 / 9.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 350 BlueTEC
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 35 MPG
    (11.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—870 miles (800—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 320 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 500
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 22 MPG
    (15.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 350
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 24 MPG
    (14.5 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 500 4Matic
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (17.6 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 550
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (17.6 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle AMG ML 63
    Consumption (city / highway) 10 / 19 MPG
    (24.1 / 12.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 60% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz ML MPG

      • average 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 20 MPG / 13.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 11 MPG / 20.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: 29 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2085 kg / 4597 lbs
      • body type: off-road vehicle
      • difference highway / city: 42%
      • average engine power: 177 kW / 241 hp
      • difference from world average: 37% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 635 miles (1022 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG is between 11 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • ML 230 — 13 to 24 MPG
  • ML 400 CDI — 16 to 27 MPG
  • ML 350 — 13 to 22 MPG
  • ML 270 CDI — 19 to 29 MPG
  • ML 430 — 15 to 25 MPG
  • ML 500 — 11 to 21 MPG
  • ML 320 V6 — 13 to 21 MPG
  • AMG ML 55 — 12 to 21 MPG

    1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG to weight ratio

    The 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • ML 230 — 103 kg/mpg
  • ML 400 CDI — 108 kg/mpg
  • ML 350 — 121 kg/mpg
  • ML 270 CDI — 79 kg/mpg
  • ML 430 — 101 kg/mpg
  • ML 500 — 134 kg/mpg
  • ML 320 V6 — 117 kg/mpg
  • AMG ML 55 — 130 kg/mpg

    1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.

  • ML 230 is 44% less economical than average car
  • ML 400 CDI is 34% less economical than average car
  • ML 350 is 44% less economical than average car
  • ML 270 CDI is 19% less economical than average car
  • ML 430 is 37% less economical than average car
  • ML 500 is 50% less economical than average car
  • ML 320 V6 is 47% less economical than average car
  • AMG ML 55 is 50% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (W163) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    ML 230 13 / 24 MPG
    (17.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2.6 L per 100 km / person
    ML 400 CDI 16 / 27 MPG
    (14.9 / 8.8 L per 100 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    ML 350 13 / 22 MPG
    (18.6 / 10.5 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)
    2.7 L per 100 km / person
    ML 270 CDI 19 / 29 MPG
    (12.4 / 8 L per 100 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    ML 430 15 / 25 MPG
    (16.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km / person
    ML 500 11 / 21 MPG
    (20.5 / 11.2 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 50% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    2.9 L per 100 km / person
    ML 320 V6 13 / 21 MPG
    (18.2 / 11.2 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    2.8 L per 100 km / person
    AMG ML 55 12 / 21 MPG
    (19.7 / 11.4 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 50% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)
    2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (W163) MPG

    Vehicle ML 230
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (17.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 400 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 27 MPG
    (14.9 / 8.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 350
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 22 MPG
    (18.6 / 10.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 270 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 29 MPG
    (12.4 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 430
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 25 MPG
    (16.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 500
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 21 MPG
    (20.5 / 11.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 50% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle ML 320 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 21 MPG
    (18.2 / 11.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle AMG ML 55
    Consumption (city / highway) 12 / 21 MPG
    (19.7 / 11.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 50% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person