cat_logo
HomeMercedes-benz

Clk

Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG by Years

Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG

    • average 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 27 MPG / 10.1 L per 100 km
    • worst 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 11 MPG / 21.3 L per 100 km
    • best 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 46 MPG / 5.1 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1600 kg / 3528 lbs
    • body type: coupe
    • difference highway / city: 46%
    • average engine power: 203 kW / 276 hp
    • difference from world average: 16% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 602 miles (969 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is between 11 MPG and 46 MPG depending on engine:

  • CLK 350 — 16 to 32 MPG
  • CLK 200 — 19 to 38 MPG
  • CLK 280 — 18 to 34 MPG
  • AMG CLK 63 — 11 to 24 MPG
  • CLK 220 CDI — 27 to 46 MPG
  • CLK 320 CDI — 24 to 41 MPG
  • CLK 500 — 14 to 28 MPG


    2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio

    The 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • CLK 350 — 64 kg/mpg
  • CLK 200 — 53 kg/mpg
  • CLK 280 — 58 kg/mpg
  • AMG CLK 63 — 99 kg/mpg
  • CLK 220 CDI — 41 kg/mpg
  • CLK 320 CDI — 47 kg/mpg
  • CLK 500 — 76 kg/mpg


    2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • CLK 350 is 25% less economical than average car
  • CLK 200 is 13% less economical than average car
  • CLK 280 is 19% less economical than average car
  • AMG CLK 63 is 47% less economical than average car
  • CLK 220 CDI is 16% more economical than average car
  • CLK 320 CDI is 0% more economical than average car
  • CLK 500 is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (C 209 facelift 2005) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    CLK 350 16 / 32 MPG
    (14.3 / 7.3 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 200 19 / 38 MPG
    (12.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 280 18 / 34 MPG
    (13.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    AMG CLK 63 11 / 24 MPG
    (21.3 / 10 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 186—373 miles
    (300—600 km)     		3.6 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 220 CDI 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 435—746 miles
    (700—1200 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 320 CDI 24 / 41 MPG
    (10 / 5.8 L per 100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 500 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.7 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (C 209 facelift 2005) MPG

    Vehicle CLK 350
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 32 MPG
    (14.3 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 200
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 38 MPG
    (12.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 280
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 34 MPG
    (13.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle AMG CLK 63
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 24 MPG
    (21.3 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—373 miles (300—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 220 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 46 MPG
    (8.6 / 5.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 435—746 miles (700—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 320 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 41 MPG
    (10 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 500
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.7 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG

      • average 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 26 MPG / 10 L per 100 km
      • worst 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 14 MPG / 17.1 L per 100 km
      • best 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 42 MPG / 5.6 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1800 kg / 3969 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 47%
      • average engine power: 191 kW / 260 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 542 miles (873 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is between 14 MPG and 42 MPG depending on engine:

  • CLK 320 CDI — 24 to 42 MPG
  • CLK 200 — 19 to 36 MPG
  • CLK 280 — 17 to 34 MPG
  • CLK 350 — 16 to 31 MPG
  • CLK 500 — 14 to 28 MPG


    2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio

    The 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • CLK 320 CDI — 54 kg/mpg
  • CLK 200 — 62 kg/mpg
  • CLK 280 — 63 kg/mpg
  • CLK 350 — 75 kg/mpg
  • CLK 500 — 90 kg/mpg


    2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.

  • CLK 320 CDI is 3% more economical than average car
  • CLK 200 is 16% less economical than average car
  • CLK 280 is 22% less economical than average car
  • CLK 350 is 28% less economical than average car
  • CLK 500 is 37% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (A 209 facelift 2005) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    CLK 320 CDI 24 / 42 MPG
    (9.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% better 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 200 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 280 17 / 34 MPG
    (13.8 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 350 16 / 31 MPG
    (14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 500 14 / 28 MPG
    (17.1 / 8.5 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK (A 209 facelift 2005) MPG

    Vehicle CLK 320 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 42 MPG
    (9.7 / 5.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% better
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 200
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.2 / 6.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 280
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 34 MPG
    (13.8 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 350
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 31 MPG
    (14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 500
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (17.1 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG

      • average 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 26 MPG / 9.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 16 MPG / 14.7 L per 100 km
      • best 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 44 MPG / 5.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1715 kg / 3782 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 29%
      • average engine power: 164 kW / 223 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 575 miles (925 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is between 16 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:

  • CLK 200 CGI — 25 to 36 MPG
  • CLK 270 CDI — 31 to 44 MPG
  • CLK 500 — 18 to 26 MPG
  • CLK 200 — 24 to 34 MPG
  • CLK 240 — 20 to 28 MPG
  • CLK 320 — 20 to 28 MPG
  • AMG CLK 55 — 16 to 23 MPG


    2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio

    The 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • CLK 200 CGI — 53 kg/mpg
  • CLK 270 CDI — 47 kg/mpg
  • CLK 500 — 83 kg/mpg
  • CLK 200 — 57 kg/mpg
  • CLK 240 — 68 kg/mpg
  • CLK 320 — 70 kg/mpg
  • AMG CLK 55 — 95 kg/mpg


    2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.

  • CLK 200 CGI is 9% less economical than average car
  • CLK 270 CDI is 9% more economical than average car
  • CLK 500 is 37% less economical than average car
  • CLK 200 is 16% less economical than average car
  • CLK 240 is 28% less economical than average car
  • CLK 320 is 28% less economical than average car
  • AMG CLK 55 is 44% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (C 209) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    CLK 200 CGI 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 270 CDI 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% better 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 500 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 200 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 240 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 320 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    AMG CLK 55 16 / 23 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (C 209) MPG

    Vehicle CLK 200 CGI
    Consumption (city / highway) 25 / 36 MPG
    (9.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 270 CDI
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 44 MPG
    (7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% better
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 500
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (13.2 / 9.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 200
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (10 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 240
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 320
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 28 MPG
    (12 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle AMG CLK 55
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 23 MPG
    (14.7 / 10.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG

      • average 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 25 MPG / 10.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 14 MPG / 17.2 L per 100 km
      • best 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 41 MPG / 5.8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1665 kg / 3671 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 48%
      • average engine power: 151 kW / 205 hp
      • difference from world average: 22% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 494 miles (795 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is between 14 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:

  • CLK 200 CGI — 21 to 41 MPG
  • CLK 500 — 14 to 27 MPG
  • CLK 240 — 15 to 30 MPG
  • CLK 320 — 15 to 31 MPG
  • CLK 200 — 19 to 36 MPG


    2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio

    The 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • CLK 200 CGI — 52 kg/mpg
  • CLK 500 — 89 kg/mpg
  • CLK 240 — 77 kg/mpg
  • CLK 320 — 75 kg/mpg
  • CLK 200 — 62 kg/mpg


    2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.

  • CLK 200 CGI is 6% less economical than average car
  • CLK 500 is 37% less economical than average car
  • CLK 240 is 31% less economical than average car
  • CLK 320 is 28% less economical than average car
  • CLK 200 is 16% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (A 209) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    CLK 200 CGI 21 / 41 MPG
    (11.1 / 5.8 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 500 14 / 27 MPG
    (17.2 / 8.6 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 240 15 / 30 MPG
    (16.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 320 15 / 31 MPG
    (15.7 / 7.7 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 200 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (A 209) MPG

    Vehicle CLK 200 CGI
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 41 MPG
    (11.1 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 500
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 27 MPG
    (17.2 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 240
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 30 MPG
    (16.1 / 7.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 320
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 31 MPG
    (15.7 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 200
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 36 MPG
    (12.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG

      • average 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 25 MPG / 10.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 14 MPG / 16.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 34 MPG / 7 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1555 kg / 3429 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 50%
      • average engine power: 158 kW / 214 hp
      • difference from world average: 22% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 410 miles (660 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is between 14 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:

  • CLK 200 — 17 to 34 MPG
  • CLK 230 — 17 to 33 MPG
  • CLK 320 — 16 to 32 MPG
  • CLK 430 — 14 to 28 MPG


    1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio

    The 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • CLK 200 — 57 kg/mpg
  • CLK 230 — 58 kg/mpg
  • CLK 320 — 65 kg/mpg
  • CLK 430 — 74 kg/mpg


    1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • CLK 200 is 22% less economical than average car
  • CLK 230 is 22% less economical than average car
  • CLK 320 is 28% less economical than average car
  • CLK 430 is 34% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (C 208 facelift 1999) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    CLK 200 17 / 34 MPG
    (13.6 / 7 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 230 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 320 16 / 32 MPG
    (15.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 430 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (C 208 facelift 1999) MPG

    Vehicle CLK 200
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 34 MPG
    (13.6 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 230
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 320
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 32 MPG
    (15.1 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 430
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG

      • average 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 24 MPG / 11.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 13 MPG / 17.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 33 MPG / 7.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1755 kg / 3870 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 50%
      • average engine power: 158 kW / 214 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 406 miles (653 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is between 13 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:

  • CLK 200 — 17 to 33 MPG
  • CLK 230 — 17 to 33 MPG
  • CLK 320 — 15 to 29 MPG
  • CLK 430 — 13 to 26 MPG


    1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio

    The 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • CLK 200 — 65 kg/mpg
  • CLK 230 — 66 kg/mpg
  • CLK 320 — 77 kg/mpg
  • CLK 430 — 92 kg/mpg


    1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • CLK 200 is 22% less economical than average car
  • CLK 230 is 22% less economical than average car
  • CLK 320 is 31% less economical than average car
  • CLK 430 is 41% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (A 208 facelift 1999) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    CLK 200 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 230 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 320 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 430 13 / 26 MPG
    (17.7 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (A 208 facelift 1999) MPG

    Vehicle CLK 200
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.7 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 230
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 33 MPG
    (13.8 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 320
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 430
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 26 MPG
    (17.7 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG

      • average 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 24 MPG / 10.9 L per 100 km
      • worst 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 15 MPG / 15.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 32 MPG / 7.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1625 kg / 3583 lbs
      • body type: cabriolet
      • difference highway / city: 49%
      • average engine power: 148 kW / 201 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 389 miles (626 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is between 15 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:

  • CLK 200 — 17 to 31 MPG
  • CLK 320 — 15 to 29 MPG
  • CLK 230 — 16 to 32 MPG


    1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio

    The 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • CLK 200 — 66 kg/mpg
  • CLK 320 — 77 kg/mpg
  • CLK 230 — 71 kg/mpg


    1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.

  • CLK 200 is 25% less economical than average car
  • CLK 320 is 31% less economical than average car
  • CLK 230 is 28% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (A 208) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    CLK 200 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 320 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 230 16 / 32 MPG
    (14.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK (A 208) MPG

    Vehicle CLK 200
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 31 MPG
    (13.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 320
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 29 MPG
    (15.7 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 230
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 32 MPG
    (14.9 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG

      • average 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 24 MPG / 10.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 14 MPG / 16.5 L per 100 km
      • best 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: 33 MPG / 7.1 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1495 kg / 3296 lbs
      • body type: coupe
      • difference highway / city: 48%
      • average engine power: 152 kW / 207 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 410 miles (660 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is between 14 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:

  • CLK 200 — 18 to 33 MPG
  • CLK 230 — 17 to 32 MPG
  • CLK 430 — 14 to 28 MPG
  • CLK 320 — 16 to 33 MPG


    1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio

    The 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • CLK 200 — 55 kg/mpg
  • CLK 230 — 59 kg/mpg
  • CLK 430 — 74 kg/mpg
  • CLK 320 — 65 kg/mpg


    1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • CLK 200 is 22% less economical than average car
  • CLK 230 is 25% less economical than average car
  • CLK 430 is 34% less economical than average car
  • CLK 320 is 28% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK (C 208) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    CLK 200 18 / 33 MPG
    (13.4 / 7.1 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 22% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 230 17 / 32 MPG
    (14.1 / 7.3 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 430 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km / person
    CLK 320 16 / 33 MPG
    (15 / 7.2 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK (C 208) MPG

    Vehicle CLK 200
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 33 MPG
    (13.4 / 7.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 230
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 32 MPG
    (14.1 / 7.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 430
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (16.5 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle CLK 320
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 33 MPG
    (15 / 7.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings