1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 MPG is 44 MPG on engine:
The 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 D |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 200 D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 MPG is 28 MPG on engine:
The 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
-
|
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 200 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |