2008 Mazda Tribute MPG is between 18 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Mazda Tribute MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Mazda Tribute MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0i V6 |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
28 MPG
(11.2 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
23 MPG
(13.1 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Mazda Tribute MPG is between 15 MPG and 30 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Mazda Tribute MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Mazda Tribute MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V 4WD |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i 16V 2WD |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.3 i 16V |
17
/
28 MPG
(13.6 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 i V6 24V 4WD |
15
/
25 MPG
(15.7 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 4WD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V 2WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
30 MPG
(12.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
28 MPG
(13.6 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
25 MPG
(15.7 / 9.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |