2018 Mazda CX-3 MPG is between 28 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Mazda CX-3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Mazda CX-3 MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.5 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 SKYACTIV-D |
44
/
50 MPG
(5.3 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
559—621 miles
(900—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Skyactiv-G |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
39 MPG
(8.5 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 SKYACTIV-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
50 MPG
(5.3 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—621 miles (900—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Skyactiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
51 MPG
(6.7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Mazda CX-3 MPG is between 30 MPG and 48 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Mazda CX-3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Mazda CX-3 MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5d |
42
/
48 MPG
(5.6 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
497—559 miles
(800—900 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
43 MPG
(7.8 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5d |
Consumption (city / highway) |
42
/
48 MPG
(5.6 / 4.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—559 miles (800—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |