2018 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2018)
2018 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2018)
2015 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2015)
2015 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2015)
2012 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II
2012 BT-50 Dual Cab II
2008 BT-50 Double Cab I (facelift 2008)
2008 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I (facelift 2008)
2006 BT-50 Double Cab I
2006 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I
2018 Mazda BT-50 MPG is 28 MPG on engine:
The 2018 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(12 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2018 Mazda BT-50 MPG is between 19 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.2 |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
27 MPG
(12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Mazda BT-50 MPG is 32 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Mazda BT-50 MPG is between 22 MPG and 32 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
XTR 3.2 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Mazda BT-50 MPG is 32 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Mazda BT-50 MPG is between 22 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
XTR 3.2 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Mazda BT-50 MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2008 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.6 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.6 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Mazda BT-50 MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2008 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.6 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(11.6 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Mazda BT-50 MPG is 30 MPG on engine:
The 2006 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Mazda BT-50 MPG is 30 MPG on engine:
The 2006 Mazda BT-50 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Mazda BT-50 MPG is up to 19% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
30 MPG
(10.9 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |