1998 Mazda 626 MPG is between 22 MPG and 50 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Mazda 626 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Mazda 626 MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo DI |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 H.P. |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.4 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.8 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo DI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 H.P. |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Mazda 626 MPG is between 22 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Mazda 626 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Mazda 626 MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo DI |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo DI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Mazda 626 MPG is between 22 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Mazda 626 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Mazda 626 MPG is up to 34% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Turbo DI |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
38 MPG
(10.1 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo DI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
52 MPG
(6.4 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Mazda 626 MPG is between 22 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Mazda 626 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Mazda 626 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D GLX Comprex |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 24V |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
38 MPG
(8.9 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D GLX Comprex |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.9 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Mazda 626 MPG is between 24 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Mazda 626 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Mazda 626 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 i |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.2i |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
44 MPG
(7.7 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
36 MPG
(9.5 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
35 MPG
(9.8 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1992 Mazda 626 MPG is between 22 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 1992 Mazda 626 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1992 Mazda 626 MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D GLX Comprex |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
38 MPG
(10.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D GLX Comprex |
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
44 MPG
(7.8 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1987 Mazda 626 MPG is 43 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 1987 Mazda 626 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D |
35
/
43 MPG
(6.7 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
- | 22% better |
559—684 miles
(900—1100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
43 MPG
(6.7 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—684 miles (900—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1982 Mazda 626 MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 1982 Mazda 626 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1982 Mazda 626 MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
34 MPG
(10.2 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |