2010 Mazda 5 MPG is between 25 MPG and 51 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Mazda 5 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Mazda 5 MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
26
/
41 MPG
(9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.3 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.4 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.3 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
51 MPG
(6.4 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Mazda 5 MPG is between 22 MPG and 44 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Mazda 5 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Mazda 5 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 CD |
32
/
44 MPG
(7.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
44 MPG
(7.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Mazda 5 MPG is between 21 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Mazda 5 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Mazda 5 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 CD |
32
/
41 MPG
(7.3 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
32
/
41 MPG
(7.3 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |