1998 Mazda 323 MPG is between 21 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sport 2.0i 16V |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.3 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i 16V |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 DiTD |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.4 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.3 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DiTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.4 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Mazda 323 MPG is between 21 MPG and 53 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 37% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i 16V |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.3 i 16V |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.3 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 DiTD |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.4 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
34 MPG
(11.2 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.5 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
37 MPG
(9.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.3 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
44 MPG
(8.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DiTD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
53 MPG
(6.4 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Mazda 323 MPG is between 24 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i 16V |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
29
/
43 MPG
(8.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i 16V |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.5 / 6.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
43 MPG
(8.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Mazda 323 MPG is between 23 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 i 16V |
26
/
43 MPG
(9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i V6 24V |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
33 MPG
(10.2 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Mazda 323 MPG is between 26 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i 16V |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 TD |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.5i 16V |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 D |
29
/
43 MPG
(8.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 TD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
47 MPG
(7.2 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.1 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
43 MPG
(8.2 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1994 Mazda 323 MPG is between 22 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1994 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1994 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 i 16V |
28
/
43 MPG
(8.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 i 16V |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
43 MPG
(8.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.5 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Mazda 323 MPG is between 20 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 16V GT |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 4WD |
24
/
40 MPG
(9.8 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
37 MPG
(9.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V GT |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
29 MPG
(12 / 8.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 4WD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
40 MPG
(9.8 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
41 MPG
(8.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Mazda 323 MPG is 47 MPG on engine:
The 1989 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 16V |
34
/
47 MPG
(7 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
47 MPG
(7 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1989 Mazda 323 MPG is between 24 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 1989 Mazda 323 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1989 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 16V |
34
/
47 MPG
(7 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 |
24
/
36 MPG
(10 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 D |
41
/
59 MPG
(5.8 / 4 L per 100 km) |
- | 47% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.3 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
47 MPG
(7 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
36 MPG
(10 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
59 MPG
(5.8 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
1985 Mazda 323 MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
We calculated that 1985 Mazda 323 MPG is up to 9% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 |
24
/
36 MPG
(10 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
- | 9% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
36 MPG
(10 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |