2019 3 IV Sedan
2019 3 IV Hatchback
2017 3 III Sedan (BM, facelift 2017)
2017 3 III Hatchback (BM, facelift 2017)
2014 3 III Sedan (BM)
2013 3 III Hatchback (BM)
2012 3 TAKUMI
2011 3 II Hatchback (BL, facelift 2011)
2011 3 II Sedan (BL, facelift 2011)
2009 3 II Sedan (BL)
2009 3 II Hatchback (BL)
2006 3 I Sedan (BK, facelift 2006)
2006 3 I Hatchback (BK, facelift 2006)
2004 3 I Hatchback (BK)
2004 3 I Sedan (BK)
2019 Mazda 3 MPG is between 26 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:
The 2019 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 78% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 SkyActiv-D |
51
/
62 MPG
(4.6 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 78% better |
684—808 miles
(1100—1300 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 SkyActiv-G |
26
/
35 MPG
(9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
- | 6% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
51 MPG
(7 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 SkyActiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
51
/
62 MPG
(4.6 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 78% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—808 miles (1100—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 SkyActiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
35 MPG
(9 / 6.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2019 Mazda 3 MPG is between 24 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2019 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 56% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 SkyActiv-D |
45
/
55 MPG
(5.2 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 SkyActiv-G |
24
/
32 MPG
(9.8 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
- | 16% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
35
/
50 MPG
(6.8 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 SkyActiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
55 MPG
(5.2 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 SkyActiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
32 MPG
(9.8 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Mazda 3 MPG is between 27 MPG and 67 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 93% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G |
27
/
37 MPG
(8.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 SkyActiv-D |
55
/
67 MPG
(4.3 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 93% better |
746—932 miles
(1200—1500 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 SkyActiv-D |
50
/
67 MPG
(4.7 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 88% better |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 SkyActiv-G |
27
/
36 MPG
(8.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
37 MPG
(8.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
55
/
67 MPG
(4.3 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 93% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—932 miles (1200—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 SkyActiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
50
/
67 MPG
(4.7 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 88% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 SkyActiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
36 MPG
(8.7 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2017 Mazda 3 MPG is between 25 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G |
27
/
37 MPG
(8.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 SkyActiv-G |
36
/
55 MPG
(6.5 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 SkyActiv-D |
39
/
57 MPG
(6 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 SkyActiv-D |
48
/
57 MPG
(4.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 SkyActiv-G |
25
/
33 MPG
(9.4 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
37 MPG
(8.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
55 MPG
(6.5 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 SkyActiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
57 MPG
(6 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
57 MPG
(4.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 SkyActiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
33 MPG
(9.4 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2014 Mazda 3 MPG is between 31 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 2014 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G |
34
/
49 MPG
(7 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 SkyActiv-G |
37
/
56 MPG
(6.4 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Skyactiv-G |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 SkyActiv-D |
39
/
57 MPG
(6 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 Skyactiv-D |
48
/
57 MPG
(4.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
49 MPG
(7 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
56 MPG
(6.4 / 4.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Skyactiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 SkyActiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
57 MPG
(6 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Skyactiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
57 MPG
(4.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Mazda 3 MPG is between 31 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 SkyActiv-G |
36
/
55 MPG
(6.5 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 SkyActiv-G |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 SkyActiv-D |
39
/
57 MPG
(6 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
559—746 miles
(900—1200 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 Skyactiv-D |
48
/
57 MPG
(4.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
55 MPG
(6.5 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
49 MPG
(7.5 / 4.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 SkyActiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
57 MPG
(6 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—746 miles (900—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 Skyactiv-D |
Consumption (city / highway) |
48
/
57 MPG
(4.9 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Mazda 3 MPG is between 28 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
45
/
62 MPG
(5.2 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
62 MPG
(5.2 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Mazda 3 MPG is between 18 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPS 2.3i |
18
/
31 MPG
(13.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 CD |
36
/
53 MPG
(6.6 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 DISI |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.6 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 CD |
34
/
52 MPG
(6.9 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
45
/
62 MPG
(5.2 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | MPS 2.3i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
31 MPG
(13.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
53 MPG
(6.6 / 4.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DISI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.6 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
52 MPG
(6.9 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
62 MPG
(5.2 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Mazda 3 MPG is between 22 MPG and 62 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 72% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 DISI |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.6 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
45
/
62 MPG
(5.2 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 72% better |
684—870 miles
(1100—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.4 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DISI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
44 MPG
(9.1 / 5.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
41 MPG
(10.6 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
62 MPG
(5.2 / 3.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 72% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—870 miles (1100—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Mazda 3 MPG is between 22 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 CD |
44
/
60 MPG
(5.3 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 CD |
33
/
50 MPG
(7.2 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.3 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.7 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 DISI |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
60 MPG
(5.3 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
50 MPG
(7.2 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.3 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.7 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DISI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Mazda 3 MPG is between 18 MPG and 60 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 CD |
33
/
50 MPG
(7.2 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.7 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.3 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 DISI |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 CD |
34
/
52 MPG
(6.9 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
44
/
60 MPG
(5.3 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
MPS 2.3i |
18
/
31 MPG
(13.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 CD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
50 MPG
(7.2 / 4.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
40 MPG
(10.7 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
45 MPG
(8.3 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 DISI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
44 MPG
(9.3 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
34
/
52 MPG
(6.9 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
60 MPG
(5.3 / 3.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | MPS 2.3i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
31 MPG
(13.2 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Mazda 3 MPG is between 22 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 53% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
39
/
57 MPG
(6.1 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 CD |
33
/
44 MPG
(7.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
57 MPG
(6.1 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
44 MPG
(7.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Mazda 3 MPG is between 17 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 56% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
1.6i |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
MPS 2.3i |
17
/
31 MPG
(13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
39
/
59 MPG
(6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 CD |
33
/
44 MPG
(7.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
43 MPG
(8.6 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
41 MPG
(8.9 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | MPS 2.3i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
31 MPG
(13.5 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
39
/
59 MPG
(6 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
33
/
44 MPG
(7.1 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Mazda 3 MPG is between 20 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.3 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.4i |
26
/
39 MPG
(8.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
38
/
55 MPG
(6.2 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.3 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
39 MPG
(8.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
55 MPG
(6.2 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Mazda 3 MPG is between 20 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Mazda 3 MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Mazda 3 MPG is up to 47% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.3 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 CD |
38
/
55 MPG
(6.2 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
39 MPG
(9.3 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Consumption (city / highway) |
38
/
55 MPG
(6.2 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
37 MPG
(11.5 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |