2019 Lotus Exige MPG is 29 MPG on engine:
The 2019 Lotus Exige MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Lotus Exige MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sport 410 3.5 V6 |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
-
|
5.3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | Sport 410 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 5.3 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Lotus Exige MPG is between 16 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Lotus Exige MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Lotus Exige MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sport 350 3.5 V6 |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
5.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Sport 410 3.5 V6 |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
-
|
5.3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | Sport 350 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 5.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | Sport 410 3.5 V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(14.9 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 5.3 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Lotus Exige MPG is between 16 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Lotus Exige MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Lotus Exige MPG is up to 28% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cup 3.5 V6 |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
- | 28% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
5.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Sport 350 3.5 V6 |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
5.1 L per 100 km / person |
| S 3.5 V6 |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
5.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Cup 380 3.5 V6 |
17
/
28 MPG
(14.1 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
-
|
5.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Sport 380 3.5 V6 |
21
/
37 MPG
(11 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
-
|
4.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | Cup 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | - |
| Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 5.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | Sport 350 3.5 V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 5.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | S 3.5 V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
31 MPG
(14.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 5.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | Cup 380 3.5 V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
28 MPG
(14.1 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 5.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | Sport 380 3.5 V6 |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
37 MPG
(11 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 4.4 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Lotus Exige MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 2004 Lotus Exige MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Lotus Exige MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.8 i 16V |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
186—373 miles
(300—600 km) |
4.8 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 186—373 miles (300—600 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 4.8 L per 100 km / person |
