2020 Lotus Evora MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
The 2020 Lotus Evora MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2020 Lotus Evora MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 V6 |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.5 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
5.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.5 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 5.9 L per 100 km / person |
2016 Lotus Evora MPG is 33 MPG on engine:
The 2016 Lotus Evora MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2016 Lotus Evora MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 V6 |
17
/
33 MPG
(14.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
-
|
4.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
33 MPG
(14.1 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | - |
| Consumption per passenger | 4.9 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Lotus Evora MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 2013 Lotus Evora MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Lotus Evora MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 V6 |
16
/
34 MPG
(14.4 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
4.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
34 MPG
(14.4 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 4.9 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Lotus Evora MPG is 34 MPG on engine:
The 2012 Lotus Evora MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Lotus Evora MPG is up to 25% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 V6 |
16
/
34 MPG
(14.4 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
4.9 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
34 MPG
(14.4 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 4.9 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Lotus Evora MPG is 36 MPG on engine:
The 2010 Lotus Evora MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Lotus Evora MPG is up to 16% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 V6 |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
4.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
36 MPG
(12.4 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 4.4 L per 100 km / person |
