cat_logo
HomeLotus

Esprit

Lotus Esprit MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Lotus Esprit MPG by Years

Lotus Esprit MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Lotus Esprit MPG

    • average 1976 Lotus Esprit MPG: 21 MPG / 12.1 L per 100 km
    • worst 1976 Lotus Esprit MPG: 12 MPG / 20 L per 100 km
    • best 1976 Lotus Esprit MPG: 29 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 1380 kg / 3043 lbs
    • body type: coupe
    • difference highway / city: 44%
    • average engine power: 200 kW / 272 hp
    • difference from world average: 34% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 458 miles (737 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

1976 Lotus Esprit MPG (Miles per Gallon)

1976 Lotus Esprit MPG is between 12 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo GT3 — 12 to 29 MPG
  • 2.2 i 16V TurboS4s — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 2.2 i 16V Turbo Sport 300 — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 2.2 i 16V Turbo SE S4 — 19 to 27 MPG
  • 2.2 i Turbo — 15 to 28 MPG
  • 2.2 Turbo — 14 to 28 MPG
  • 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo — 12 to 25 MPG


    1976 Lotus Esprit MPG to weight ratio

    The 1976 Lotus Esprit MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo GT3 — 79 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 i 16V TurboS4s — 62 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 i 16V Turbo Sport 300 — 58 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 i 16V Turbo SE S4 — 63 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 i Turbo — 53 kg/mpg
  • 2.2 Turbo — 62 kg/mpg
  • 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo — 86 kg/mpg


    1976 Lotus Esprit MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1976 Lotus Esprit MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.0 i 16V Turbo GT3 is 47% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 i 16V TurboS4s is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 i 16V Turbo Sport 300 is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 i 16V Turbo SE S4 is 34% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 i Turbo is 25% less economical than average car
  • 2.2 Turbo is 31% less economical than average car
  • 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo is 50% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1976 Lotus Esprit MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.0 i 16V Turbo GT3 12 / 29 MPG
    (19 / 8 L per 100 km)     		1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		6.8 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 i 16V TurboS4s 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.9 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		5.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 i 16V Turbo Sport 300 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.9 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		5.6 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 i 16V Turbo SE S4 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.7 / 8.8 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		5.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 i Turbo 15 / 28 MPG
    (15.7 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		5 L per 100 km / person
    2.2 Turbo 14 / 28 MPG
    (17.2 / 8.3 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 249—559 miles
    (400—900 km)     		5.3 L per 100 km / person
    3.5 i V8 32V Turbo 12 / 25 MPG
    (20 / 9.3 L per 100 km)     		0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 50% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		7.4 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1976 Lotus Esprit MPG

    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V Turbo GT3
    Consumption (city / highway) 12 / 29 MPG
    (19 / 8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 6.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 i 16V TurboS4s
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.9 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 i 16V Turbo Sport 300
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.9 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 i 16V Turbo SE S4
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.7 / 8.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 i Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 28 MPG
    (15.7 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.2 Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 28 MPG
    (17.2 / 8.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—559 miles (400—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 5.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo
    Consumption (city / highway) 12 / 25 MPG
    (20 / 9.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 50% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 7.4 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings