2017.5 Lotus Elise MPG is between 23 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017.5 Lotus Elise MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017.5 Lotus Elise MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cup 250 1.8 |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 1.6 |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
-
|
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
Sport 220 1.8 |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.3 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Cup 250 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Sport 220 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.3 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
2015 Lotus Elise MPG is 40 MPG on engine:
The 2015 Lotus Elise MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Lotus Elise MPG is up to 3% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.3 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.3 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Lotus Elise MPG is between 23 MPG and 47 MPG depending on engine:
The 2011 Lotus Elise MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Lotus Elise MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
CR 1.6 |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% better |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
S 1.8 |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.3 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
S CR 1.8 |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.3 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
S Cup 1.8 |
24
/
39 MPG
(9.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Cup 250 1.8 |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Cup 260 1.8 |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
-
|
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | CR 1.6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
47 MPG
(8.3 / 5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | S 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.3 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | S CR 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.3 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | S Cup 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
39 MPG
(9.9 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Cup 250 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | Cup 260 1.8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
39 MPG
(10.1 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Lotus Elise MPG is between 20 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Lotus Elise MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Lotus Elise MPG is up to 6% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.4 / 6.15 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V 111 |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% better |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V 111R |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
186—311 miles
(300—500 km) |
4.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
38 MPG
(9.4 / 6.15 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V 111 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
43 MPG
(9.4 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V 111R |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—311 miles (300—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 4.8 L per 100 km / person |
1996 Lotus Elise MPG is between 25 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 1996 Lotus Elise MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1996 Lotus Elise MPG is up to 6% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.8 i 16V 111S |
25
/
40 MPG
(9.6 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.6 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 0.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V 111S |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
40 MPG
(9.6 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.9 L per 100 km / person |