2017 Lincoln MKZ MPG is between 17 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Lincoln MKZ MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Lincoln MKZ MPG is up to 28% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 GTDI V6 |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.8 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 GTDI |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
41
/
39 MPG
(5.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% better |
559—497 miles
(900—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 GTDI V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(13.8 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 GTDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
28 MPG
(11.8 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
39 MPG
(5.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—497 miles (900—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Lincoln MKZ MPG is between 19 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Lincoln MKZ MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Lincoln MKZ MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
45
/
45 MPG
(5.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% better |
621—621 miles
(1000—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
3.7 V6 |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
45
/
45 MPG
(5.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—621 miles (1000—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Lincoln MKZ MPG is between 18 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Lincoln MKZ MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Lincoln MKZ MPG is up to 22% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 24V |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 |
41
/
36 MPG
(5.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
746—621 miles
(1200—1000 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
41
/
36 MPG
(5.7 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—621 miles (1200—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Lincoln MKZ MPG is 26 MPG on engine:
The 2006 Lincoln MKZ MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Lincoln MKZ MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 24V |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 24V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(13.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |