Lincoln LS MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Lincoln LS MPG by Years

- average 2000 Lincoln LS MPG: 21 MPG / 11.7 L per 100 km
- worst 2000 Lincoln LS MPG: 15 MPG / 16 L per 100 km
- best 2000 Lincoln LS MPG: 29 MPG / 8 L per 100 km
- body type: sedan
- difference highway / city: 41%
- average engine power: 178 kW / 242 hp
- difference from world average: 34% worse
- max distance with full tank: 384 miles (618 km)
- Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2000 Lincoln LS MPG is between 15 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

3.0 i V6 24V — 17 to 29 MPG

3.0i V6 24V — 18 to 25 MPG

3.0 V6 24V — 17 to 29 MPG

3.9 i V8 32V — 15 to 26 MPG

4.0 V8 32V — 15 to 26 MPG

The 2000 Lincoln LS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

3.0 i V6 24V — 80 kg/mpg

3.0i V6 24V — 80 kg/mpg

3.0 V6 24V — 78 kg/mpg

3.9 i V8 32V — 90 kg/mpg

We calculated that 2000 Lincoln LS MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

3.0 i V6 24V is 34% less economical than average car

3.0i V6 24V is 34% less economical than average car

3.0 V6 24V is 34% less economical than average car

3.9 i V8 32V is 41% less economical than average car

4.0 V8 32V is 41% less economical than average car

Vehicle	Consumption (city / highway)	Consumption to weight ratio	Difference from world average consumption	Driving range (full tank)	Consumption per passenger
3.0 i V6 24V	17 / 29 MPG (14 / 8 L per 100 km)	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg	34% worse	311—559 miles (500—900 km)	2.2 L per 100 km / person
3.0i V6 24V	18 / 25 MPG (13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km)	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg	34% worse	311—435 miles (500—700 km)	2.3 L per 100 km / person
3.0 V6 24V	17 / 29 MPG (14 / 8 L per 100 km)	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg	34% worse	311—559 miles (500—900 km)	2.2 L per 100 km / person
3.9 i V8 32V	15 / 26 MPG (16 / 9 L per 100 km)	1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg	41% worse	249—497 miles (400—800 km)	2.5 L per 100 km / person
4.0 V8 32V	15 / 26 MPG (16 / 9 L per 100 km)	-	41% worse	249—497 miles (400—800 km)	2.5 L per 100 km / person

Vehicle	3.0 i V6 24V
Consumption (city / highway)	17 / 29 MPG (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	34% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—559 miles (500—900 km)
Consumption per passenger	2.2 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	3.0i V6 24V
Consumption (city / highway)	18 / 25 MPG (13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	34% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—435 miles (500—700 km)
Consumption per passenger	2.3 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	3.0 V6 24V
Consumption (city / highway)	17 / 29 MPG (14 / 8 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	34% worse
Driving range (full tank)	311—559 miles (500—900 km)
Consumption per passenger	2.2 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	3.9 i V8 32V
Consumption (city / highway)	15 / 26 MPG (16 / 9 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
Difference from world average consumption	41% worse
Driving range (full tank)	249—497 miles (400—800 km)
Consumption per passenger	2.5 L per 100 km / person
Vehicle	4.0 V8 32V
Consumption (city / highway)	15 / 26 MPG (16 / 9 L per 100 km)
Consumption to weight ratio	-
Difference from world average consumption	41% worse
Driving range (full tank)	249—497 miles (400—800 km)
Consumption per passenger	2.5 L per 100 km / person