2017 Lincoln Continental MPG is between 16 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Lincoln Continental MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Lincoln Continental MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 V6 |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 GTDI V6 |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
3.7 V6 |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 GTDI V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
1995 Lincoln Continental MPG is 24 MPG on engine:
The 1995 Lincoln Continental MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1995 Lincoln Continental MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.6 V8 32V |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.6 V8 32V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(13.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |