cat_logo
HomeLexus

Rx

Lexus RX MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Lexus RX MPG by Years

Lexus RX MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Lexus RX MPG

    • average 2020 Lexus RX MPG: 24 MPG / 9.9 L per 100 km
    • worst 2020 Lexus RX MPG: 18 MPG / 13 L per 100 km
    • best 2020 Lexus RX MPG: 28 MPG / 8.4 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 2147 kg / 4734 lbs
    • body type: SUV
    • difference highway / city: 15%
    • average engine power: 219 kW / 298 hp
    • difference from world average: 25% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 582 miles (936 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

2020 Lexus RX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2020 Lexus RX MPG is between 18 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:

  • 350 V6 — 19 to 26 MPG
  • 350L V6 — 18 to 25 MPG
  • 450h V6 — 31 to 28 MPG


    2020 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio

    The 2020 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 350 V6 — 90 kg/mpg
  • 350L V6 — 99 kg/mpg
  • 450h V6 — 72 kg/mpg


    2020 Lexus RX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2020 Lexus RX MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 350 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 350L V6 is 34% less economical than average car
  • 450h V6 is 6% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2020 Lexus RX IV (facelift 2019) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    350 V6 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.3 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    350L V6 18 / 25 MPG
    (13 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    450h V6 31 / 28 MPG
    (7.6 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 559—497 miles
    (900—800 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2020 Lexus RX IV (facelift 2019) MPG

    Vehicle 350 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.3 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 350L V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 25 MPG
    (13 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 450h V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 28 MPG
    (7.6 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—497 miles (900—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Lexus RX MPG

      • average 2016 Lexus RX MPG: 30 MPG / 8.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 2016 Lexus RX MPG: 19 MPG / 12.3 L per 100 km
      • best 2016 Lexus RX MPG: 45 MPG / 5.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2205-2275 kg / 4862 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 12%
      • average engine power: 206 kW / 279 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 872 miles (1404 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2016 Lexus RX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2016 Lexus RX MPG is between 19 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:

  • 350 V6 — 20 to 27 MPG
  • 200t — 24 to 35 MPG
  • 450h V6 — 45 to 45 MPG
  • 350L V6 — 20 to 27 MPG
  • 350 F Sport V6 — 19 to 26 MPG
  • 450h F Sport V6 — 31 to 28 MPG
  • L 450h V6 — 38 to 39 MPG


    2016 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio

    The 2016 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 350 V6 — 83 kg/mpg
  • 200t — 69 kg/mpg
  • 450h V6 — 48 kg/mpg
  • 350L V6 — 88 kg/mpg
  • 350 F Sport V6 — 90 kg/mpg
  • 450h F Sport V6 — 72 kg/mpg
  • L 450h V6 — 55 kg/mpg


    2016 Lexus RX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2016 Lexus RX MPG is up to 41% better than the world average consumption.

  • 350 V6 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 200t is 6% less economical than average car
  • 450h V6 is 41% more economical than average car
  • 350L V6 is 28% less economical than average car
  • 350 F Sport V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 450h F Sport V6 is 6% less economical than average car
  • L 450h V6 is 25% more economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2016 Lexus RX IV MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    350 V6 20 / 27 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    200t 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    450h V6 45 / 45 MPG
    (5.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km)     		4.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% better 808—808 miles
    (1300—1300 km)     		1 L per 100 km / person
    350L V6 20 / 27 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 28% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    350 F Sport V6 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.3 / 9 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—497 miles
    (600—800 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    450h F Sport V6 31 / 28 MPG
    (7.5 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% worse 559—497 miles
    (900—800 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person
    L 450h V6 38 / 39 MPG
    (6.2 / 6 L per 100 km)     		3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% better 621—684 miles
    (1000—1100 km)     		0.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2016 Lexus RX IV MPG

    Vehicle 350 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 27 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 200t
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 35 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 450h V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 45 / 45 MPG
    (5.2 / 5.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 4.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% better
    Driving range (full tank) 808—808 miles (1300—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 350L V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 27 MPG
    (11.7 / 8.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 28% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 350 F Sport V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 26 MPG
    (12.3 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—497 miles (600—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 450h F Sport V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 28 MPG
    (7.5 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—497 miles (900—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle L 450h V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 38 / 39 MPG
    (6.2 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—684 miles (1000—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Lexus RX MPG

      • average 2012 Lexus RX MPG: 28 MPG / 9.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 2012 Lexus RX MPG: 16 MPG / 14.3 L per 100 km
      • best 2012 Lexus RX MPG: 39 MPG / 6 L per 100 km
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 28%
      • average engine power: 175 kW / 238 hp
      • difference from world average: 13% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 710 miles (1143 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2012 Lexus RX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2012 Lexus RX MPG is between 16 MPG and 39 MPG depending on engine:

  • 270 — 18 to 31 MPG
  • 350 — 16 to 28 MPG
  • 450h — 36 to 39 MPG


    2012 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio

    The 2012 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 270 — 77 kg/mpg
  • 350 — 90 kg/mpg


    2012 Lexus RX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2012 Lexus RX MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 270 is 25% less economical than average car
  • 350 is 31% less economical than average car
  • 450h is 16% more economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2012 Lexus RX III (facelift 2012) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    270 18 / 31 MPG
    (13.3 / 7.7 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 25% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2 L per 100 km / person
    350 16 / 28 MPG
    (14.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    450h 36 / 39 MPG
    (6.5 / 6 L per 100 km)     		- 16% better 621—684 miles
    (1000—1100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2012 Lexus RX III (facelift 2012) MPG

    Vehicle 270
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 31 MPG
    (13.3 / 7.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 25% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 350
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 28 MPG
    (14.3 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 450h
    Consumption (city / highway) 36 / 39 MPG
    (6.5 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—684 miles (1000—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Lexus RX MPG

      • average 2010 Lexus RX MPG: 30 MPG / 6.3 L per 100 km
      • worst 2010 Lexus RX MPG: 36 MPG / 6.6 L per 100 km
      • best 2010 Lexus RX MPG: 39 MPG / 6 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2130 kg / 4697 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 8%
      • average engine power: 183 kW / 249 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 641 miles (1032 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2010 Lexus RX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2010 Lexus RX MPG is 39 MPG on engine:

  • 450h — 36 to 39 MPG


    2010 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio

    The 2010 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 450h — 58 kg/mpg


    2010 Lexus RX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2010 Lexus RX MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 450h is 16% more economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2010 Lexus RX III MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    450h 36 / 39 MPG
    (6.6 / 6 L per 100 km)     		3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 621—684 miles
    (1000—1100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2010 Lexus RX III MPG

    Vehicle 450h
    Consumption (city / highway) 36 / 39 MPG
    (6.6 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—684 miles (1000—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Lexus RX MPG

      • average 2004 Lexus RX MPG: 26 MPG / 11.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 2004 Lexus RX MPG: 14 MPG / 16.9 L per 100 km
      • best 2004 Lexus RX MPG: 31 MPG / 7.6 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2000 kg / 4410 lbs
      • body type: off-road vehicle
      • difference highway / city: 33%
      • average engine power: 180 kW / 245 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 552 miles (889 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2004 Lexus RX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2004 Lexus RX MPG is between 14 MPG and 31 MPG depending on engine:

  • 300 4WD — 14 to 25 MPG
  • 330 — 18 to 24 MPG
  • 350 4WD — 15 to 28 MPG
  • 400h 4WD — 26 to 31 MPG


    2004 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio

    The 2004 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 300 4WD — 97 kg/mpg
  • 330 — 88 kg/mpg
  • 350 4WD — 87 kg/mpg
  • 400h 4WD — 69 kg/mpg


    2004 Lexus RX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2004 Lexus RX MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 300 4WD is 41% less economical than average car
  • 330 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 350 4WD is 34% less economical than average car
  • 400h 4WD is 9% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2004 Lexus RX II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    300 4WD 14 / 25 MPG
    (16.9 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    330 18 / 24 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.8 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    350 4WD 15 / 28 MPG
    (15.7 / 8.5 L per 100 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    400h 4WD 26 / 31 MPG
    (9.1 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 9% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)     		1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2004 Lexus RX II MPG

    Vehicle 300 4WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 25 MPG
    (16.9 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 330
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 24 MPG
    (13.1 / 9.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 350 4WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 28 MPG
    (15.7 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 400h 4WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 26 / 31 MPG
    (9.1 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 9% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Lexus RX MPG

      • average 1999 Lexus RX MPG: 25 MPG / 13 L per 100 km
      • worst 1999 Lexus RX MPG: 13 MPG / 17.7 L per 100 km
      • best 1999 Lexus RX MPG: 23 MPG / 10.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 1830 kg / 4035 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 31%
      • average engine power: 164 kW / 223 hp
      • difference from world average: 22% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 339 miles (546 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1999 Lexus RX MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1999 Lexus RX MPG is between 13 MPG and 23 MPG depending on engine:

  • 300 — 18 to 22 MPG
  • 300 4WD — 13 to 23 MPG


    1999 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio

    The 1999 Lexus RX MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 300 — 86 kg/mpg
  • 300 4WD — 108 kg/mpg


    1999 Lexus RX MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1999 Lexus RX MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 300 is 37% less economical than average car
  • 300 4WD is 47% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1999 Lexus RX I MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    300 18 / 22 MPG
    (13.1 / 10.7 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 37% worse 311—373 miles
    (500—600 km)     		2.4 L per 100 km / person
    300 4WD 13 / 23 MPG
    (17.7 / 10.3 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse -
    		2.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1999 Lexus RX I MPG

    Vehicle 300
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 22 MPG
    (13.1 / 10.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 37% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—373 miles (500—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 300 4WD
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 23 MPG
    (17.7 / 10.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) -
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings