2015 Lexus GS MPG is between 16 MPG and 55 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Lexus GS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Lexus GS MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
450h V6 |
36
/
44 MPG
(6.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
300h |
51
/
55 MPG
(4.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
870—932 miles
(1400—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
F 5.0 V8 |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
300 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
200t |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.6 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
350 V6 |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.3 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 450h V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
44 MPG
(6.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300h |
Consumption (city / highway) |
51
/
55 MPG
(4.6 / 4.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 870—932 miles (1400—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | F 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.7 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.6 / 7.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 200t |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
33 MPG
(10.6 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 350 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.3 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
2012 Lexus GS MPG is between 16 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 2012 Lexus GS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2012 Lexus GS MPG is up to 56% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
250 V6 |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
350 V6 |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
300h |
49
/
52 MPG
(4.8 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% better |
870—932 miles
(1400—1500 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
450h |
36
/
44 MPG
(6.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% better |
621—746 miles
(1000—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
350 |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.4 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 250 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.4 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 350 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
30 MPG
(14.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300h |
Consumption (city / highway) |
49
/
52 MPG
(4.8 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 870—932 miles (1400—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 450h |
Consumption (city / highway) |
36
/
44 MPG
(6.5 / 5.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 350 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
26 MPG
(12.4 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2008 Lexus GS MPG is between 14 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2008 Lexus GS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2008 Lexus GS MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
450h |
22
/
25 MPG
(10.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
300 V6 |
17
/
34 MPG
(14 / 7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
350 V6 |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
460 V8 |
14
/
30 MPG
(16.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—559 miles
(400—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 450h |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
25 MPG
(10.6 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
34 MPG
(14 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 350 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
32 MPG
(10.9 / 7.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 460 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
30 MPG
(16.3 / 7.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—559 miles (400—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Lexus GS MPG is between 14 MPG and 33 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Lexus GS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Lexus GS MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
350 V6 |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
300 V6 |
16
/
33 MPG
(14.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
430 V8 |
14
/
27 MPG
(16.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
450h |
27
/
30 MPG
(8.7 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 350 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
31 MPG
(11 / 7.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
33 MPG
(14.4 / 7.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 430 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
27 MPG
(16.3 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 450h |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
30 MPG
(8.7 / 7.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2000 Lexus GS MPG is between 14 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 2000 Lexus GS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2000 Lexus GS MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
300 |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
430 V8 |
14
/
25 MPG
(17.3 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
27 MPG
(13.1 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 430 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
25 MPG
(17.3 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Lexus GS MPG is between 17 MPG and 25 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Lexus GS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Lexus GS MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
300 |
20
/
25 MPG
(11.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
400 V8 |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
25 MPG
(11.8 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 400 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
1993 Lexus GS MPG is between 14 MPG and 27 MPG depending on engine:
The 1993 Lexus GS MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1993 Lexus GS MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
300 |
18
/
24 MPG
(13.1 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
300 T3 |
14
/
27 MPG
(16.4 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
24 MPG
(13.1 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 300 T3 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
27 MPG
(16.4 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |