2017 Lexus CT MPG is 57 MPG on engine:
The 2017 Lexus CT MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Lexus CT MPG is up to 66% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
50
/
57 MPG
(4.7 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 66% better |
621—684 miles
(1000—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
50
/
57 MPG
(4.7 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 66% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—684 miles (1000—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2014 Lexus CT MPG is 67 MPG on engine:
The 2014 Lexus CT MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2014 Lexus CT MPG is up to 103% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
65
/
67 MPG
(3.6 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 103% better |
808—808 miles
(1300—1300 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
65
/
67 MPG
(3.6 / 3.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 103% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 808—808 miles (1300—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
2011 Lexus CT MPG is 64 MPG on engine:
The 2011 Lexus CT MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2011 Lexus CT MPG is up to 93% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
64
/
64 MPG
(3.7 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 93% better |
746—746 miles
(1200—1200 km) |
0.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
64
/
64 MPG
(3.7 / 3.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 93% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 746—746 miles (1200—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.8 L per 100 km / person |