Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG by Years


Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG

    • average 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 34 MPG / 9.1 L per 100 km
    • worst 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 13 MPG / 18 L per 100 km
    • best 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 107 MPG / 2.2 L per 100 km
    • body weight: 2323 kg / 5122 lbs
    • body type: SUV
    • difference highway / city: 32%
    • average engine power: 264 kW / 359 hp
    • difference from world average: 6% better
    • max distance with full tank: 2308 miles (3714 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is between 13 MPG and 107 MPG depending on engine:

  • 4.4 SDV8 — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 3.0 SDV6 — 27 to 39 MPG
  • 2.0 SD4 — 31 to 43 MPG
  • 2.0 Si4 — 21 to 29 MPG
  • P400e — 74 to 107 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 18 to 28 MPG
  • SVR 5.0 V8 — 13 to 24 MPG
  • 5.0 V8 — 13 to 24 MPG

    2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio

    The 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 4.4 SDV8 — 87 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 SDV6 — 70 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 SD4 — 56 kg/mpg
  • 2.0 Si4 — 80 kg/mpg
  • P400e — 29 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 100 kg/mpg
  • SVR 5.0 V8 — 128 kg/mpg
  • 5.0 V8 — 129 kg/mpg

    2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is up to 161% better than the world average consumption.

  • 4.4 SDV8 is 13% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 SDV6 is 3% less economical than average car
  • 2.0 SD4 is 19% more economical than average car
  • 2.0 Si4 is 19% less economical than average car
  • P400e is 161% more economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • SVR 5.0 V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 5.0 V8 is 44% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport II (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    4.4 SDV8 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 SDV6 27 / 39 MPG
    (8.6 / 6 L per 100 km)
    2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 SD4 31 / 43 MPG
    (7.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% better 621—808 miles
    (1000—1300 km)
    1.2 L per 100 km / person
    2.0 Si4 21 / 29 MPG
    (11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    P400e 74 / 107 MPG
    (3.2 / 2.2 L per 100 km)
    8.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 161% better 1740—2548 miles
    (2800—4100 km)
    0.6 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 18 / 28 MPG
    (13.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)
    2.1 L per 100 km / person
    SVR 5.0 V8 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 9.9 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    2.6 L per 100 km / person
    5.0 V8 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 9.9 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport II (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle 4.4 SDV8
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 SDV6
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 39 MPG
    (8.6 / 6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 SD4
    Consumption (city / highway) 31 / 43 MPG
    (7.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% better
    Driving range (full tank) 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.0 Si4
    Consumption (city / highway) 21 / 29 MPG
    (11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle P400e
    Consumption (city / highway) 74 / 107 MPG
    (3.2 / 2.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 8.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 161% better
    Driving range (full tank) 1740—2548 miles (2800—4100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 28 MPG
    (13.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle SVR 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 9.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 9.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG

      • average 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 28 MPG / 10.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 13 MPG / 18.3 L per 100 km
      • best 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 41 MPG / 5.8 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2310 kg / 5094 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 305 kW / 414 hp
      • difference from world average: 13% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 894 miles (1438 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is between 13 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.0 V6 — 28 to 41 MPG
  • 4.4 V8 — 24 to 34 MPG
  • SVR 5.0 V8 — 13 to 24 MPG
  • 5.0 V8 — 16 to 24 MPG

    2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio

    The 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 V6 — 66 kg/mpg
  • 4.4 V8 — 89 kg/mpg
  • SVR 5.0 V8 — 130 kg/mpg
  • 5.0 V8 — 122 kg/mpg

    2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.0 V6 is 0% more economical than average car
  • 4.4 V8 is 16% less economical than average car
  • SVR 5.0 V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 5.0 V8 is 41% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.0 V6 28 / 41 MPG
    (8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 0% 559—808 miles
    (900—1300 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km / person
    4.4 V8 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 684—932 miles
    (1100—1500 km)
    1.7 L per 100 km / person
    SVR 5.0 V8 13 / 24 MPG
    (18.3 / 9.7 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)
    2.6 L per 100 km / person
    5.0 V8 16 / 24 MPG
    (14.4 / 10 L per 100 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)
    2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport II MPG

    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 41 MPG
    (8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 0% better
    Driving range (full tank) 559—808 miles (900—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.4 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 34 MPG
    (9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle SVR 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (18.3 / 9.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 24 MPG
    (14.4 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG

      • average 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 26 MPG / 11.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 14 MPG / 17.3 L per 100 km
      • best 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 29 MPG / 8.1 L per 100 km
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 24%
      • average engine power: 254 kW / 346 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 621 miles (1000 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is between 14 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 5.0 LR V8 — 14 to 20 MPG
  • 3.0 LR-TD V6 — 24 to 29 MPG
  • 3.6 LR-TD V8 — 18 to 26 MPG

    2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio

    The 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 LR-TD V6 — 94 kg/mpg

    2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 5.0 LR V8 is 50% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 LR-TD V6 is 16% less economical than average car
  • 3.6 LR-TD V8 is 34% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport I (facelift 2009) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    5.0 LR V8 14 / 20 MPG
    (17.3 / 12 L per 100 km)
    - 50% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)
    3 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 LR-TD V6 24 / 29 MPG
    (9.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 559—621 miles
    (900—1000 km)
    1.8 L per 100 km / person
    3.6 LR-TD V8 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    - 34% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport I (facelift 2009) MPG

    Vehicle 5.0 LR V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 20 MPG
    (17.3 / 12 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 50% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 LR-TD V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 24 / 29 MPG
    (9.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—621 miles (900—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.6 LR-TD V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG

      • average 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 23 MPG / 15 L per 100 km
      • worst 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 9 MPG / 25.8 L per 100 km
      • best 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: 28 MPG / 8.5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2650 kg / 5843 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 244 kW / 332 hp
      • difference from world average: 28% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 513 miles (826 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is between 9 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.7 Td — 18 to 28 MPG
  • 4.2 i V8 32V SC — 10 to 20 MPG
  • 4.4 i V8 32V — 11 to 21 MPG
  • 3.6 TDV8 — 16 to 26 MPG
  • 5.0 L AJ-V8 — 9 to 16 MPG

    2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio

    The 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.7 Td — 108 kg/mpg
  • 4.2 i V8 32V SC — 179 kg/mpg
  • 4.4 i V8 32V — 172 kg/mpg
  • 3.6 TDV8 — 127 kg/mpg
  • 5.0 L AJ-V8 — 177 kg/mpg

    2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.7 Td is 31% less economical than average car
  • 4.2 i V8 32V SC is 56% less economical than average car
  • 4.4 i V8 32V is 56% less economical than average car
  • 3.6 TDV8 is 34% less economical than average car
  • 5.0 L AJ-V8 is 53% less economical than average car

  • Additional Details On 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport I MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.7 Td 18 / 28 MPG
    (13.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    4.2 i V8 32V SC 10 / 20 MPG
    (22.8 / 11.9 L per 100 km)
    1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 56% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)
    3.5 L per 100 km / person
    4.4 i V8 32V 11 / 21 MPG
    (21.1 / 11.4 L per 100 km)
    1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 56% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)
    3.3 L per 100 km / person
    3.6 TDV8 16 / 26 MPG
    (14.7 / 9 L per 100 km)
    2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)
    2.2 L per 100 km / person
    5.0 L AJ-V8 9 / 16 MPG
    (25.8 / 14.9 L per 100 km)
    1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg 53% worse 186—373 miles
    (300—600 km)
    3.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport I MPG

    Vehicle 2.7 Td
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 28 MPG
    (13.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.2 i V8 32V SC
    Consumption (city / highway) 10 / 20 MPG
    (22.8 / 11.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 56% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.4 i V8 32V
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 21 MPG
    (21.1 / 11.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 56% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.6 TDV8
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 26 MPG
    (14.7 / 9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 5.0 L AJ-V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 9 / 16 MPG
    (25.8 / 14.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 53% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 186—373 miles (300—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.2 L per 100 km / person