2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is between 13 MPG and 107 MPG depending on engine:
The 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2017 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is up to 161% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.4 SDV8 |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 SDV6 |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
621—870 miles
(1000—1400 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 SD4 |
31
/
43 MPG
(7.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% better |
621—808 miles
(1000—1300 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 Si4 |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
P400e |
74
/
107 MPG
(3.2 / 2.2 L per 100 km) |
8.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 161% better |
1740—2548 miles
(2800—4100 km) |
0.6 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 V6 |
18
/
28 MPG
(13.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
SVR 5.0 V8 |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.4 SDV8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
31 MPG
(10.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 SDV6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
27
/
39 MPG
(8.6 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 SD4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
43 MPG
(7.5 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 621—808 miles (1000—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
29 MPG
(11.2 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | P400e |
Consumption (city / highway) |
74
/
107 MPG
(3.2 / 2.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 8.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 161% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 1740—2548 miles (2800—4100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
28 MPG
(13.4 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | SVR 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
24 MPG
(18 / 9.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is between 13 MPG and 41 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
4.4 V8 |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
684—932 miles
(1100—1500 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
SVR 5.0 V8 |
13
/
24 MPG
(18.3 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 V8 |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
41 MPG
(8.4 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.4 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
34 MPG
(9.9 / 6.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—932 miles (1100—1500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | SVR 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
13
/
24 MPG
(18.3 / 9.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
24 MPG
(14.4 / 10 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is between 14 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:
The 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2009 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.0 LR V8 |
14
/
20 MPG
(17.3 / 12 L per 100 km) |
- | 50% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
3.0 LR-TD V6 |
24
/
29 MPG
(9.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
559—621 miles
(900—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.6 LR-TD V8 |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
- | 34% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 LR V8 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
20 MPG
(17.3 / 12 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.0 LR-TD V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
29 MPG
(9.8 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—621 miles (900—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 LR-TD V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
26 MPG
(12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | - |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is between 9 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:
The 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Sport MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 Td |
18
/
28 MPG
(13.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
4.2 i V8 32V SC |
10
/
20 MPG
(22.8 / 11.9 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
3.5 L per 100 km / person |
4.4 i V8 32V |
11
/
21 MPG
(21.1 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 56% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.6 TDV8 |
16
/
26 MPG
(14.7 / 9 L per 100 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
5.0 L AJ-V8 |
9
/
16 MPG
(25.8 / 14.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% worse |
186—373 miles
(300—600 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 Td |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
28 MPG
(13.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.2 i V8 32V SC |
Consumption (city / highway) |
10
/
20 MPG
(22.8 / 11.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.4 i V8 32V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
11
/
21 MPG
(21.1 / 11.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 56% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 TDV8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
26 MPG
(14.7 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 5.0 L AJ-V8 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
9
/
16 MPG
(25.8 / 14.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 186—373 miles (300—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.2 L per 100 km / person |