cat_logo
HomeLand-rover

Range-rover

Land Rover Range Rover MPG In Simple Graphs

Average Land Rover Range Rover MPG by Years

Land Rover Range Rover MPG - Choose Generation


Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

    • average 2018 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 18 MPG / 13.6 L per 100 km
    • worst 2018 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 15 MPG / 15.9 L per 100 km
    • best 2018 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 21 MPG / 11 L per 100 km
    • body type: coupe, SUV
    • difference highway / city: 29%
    • average engine power: 416 kW / 566 hp
    • difference from world average: 44% worse
    • max distance with full tank: 469 miles (754 km)
    • Fuelson rating: 4 / 10

2018 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

2018 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is 21 MPG on engine:

  • 5.0 V8 — 15 to 21 MPG


    2018 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2018 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 5.0 V8 is 47% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2018 Land Rover Range Rover SV coupe MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    5.0 V8 15 / 21 MPG
    (15.9 / 11 L per 100 km)     		- 47% worse 435—559 miles
    (700—900 km)     		3.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2018 Land Rover Range Rover SV coupe MPG

    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 15 / 21 MPG
    (15.9 / 11 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—559 miles (700—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 33 MPG / 8.9 L per 100 km
      • worst 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 16 MPG / 15.1 L per 100 km
      • best 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 107 MPG / 2.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2375 kg / 5237 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 280 kW / 380 hp
      • difference from world average: 3% better
      • max distance with full tank: 2308 miles (3714 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is between 16 MPG and 107 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.0 V6 — 17 to 28 MPG
  • P400e — 74 to 107 MPG
  • 4.4 V8 — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 5.0 V8 — 16 to 22 MPG
  • 3.0 SDV6 — 27 to 39 MPG
  • 4.4 SDV8 — 22 to 32 MPG
  • P400 3.0 — 19 to 27 MPG


    2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio

    The 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.0 V6 — 109 kg/mpg
  • P400e — 31 kg/mpg
  • 4.4 V8 — 93 kg/mpg
  • 5.0 V8 — 144 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 SDV6 — 77 kg/mpg
  • 4.4 SDV8 — 99 kg/mpg
  • P400 3.0 — 108 kg/mpg


    2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 161% better than the world average consumption.

  • 3.0 V6 is 31% less economical than average car
  • P400e is 161% more economical than average car
  • 4.4 V8 is 13% less economical than average car
  • 5.0 V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 SDV6 is 3% less economical than average car
  • 4.4 SDV8 is 19% less economical than average car
  • P400 3.0 is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2017 Land Rover Range Rover IV (facelift 2017) Long MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.0 V6 17 / 28 MPG
    (13.6 / 8.5 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    P400e 74 / 107 MPG
    (3.2 / 2.2 L per 100 km)     		9.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 161% better 1740—2548 miles
    (2800—4100 km)     		0.6 L per 100 km / person
    4.4 V8 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    5.0 V8 16 / 22 MPG
    (15.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 435—621 miles
    (700—1000 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 SDV6 27 / 39 MPG
    (8.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km)     		3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    4.4 SDV8 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    P400 3.0 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2017 Land Rover Range Rover IV (facelift 2017) Long MPG

    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 17 / 28 MPG
    (13.6 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle P400e
    Consumption (city / highway) 74 / 107 MPG
    (3.2 / 2.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 9.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 161% better
    Driving range (full tank) 1740—2548 miles (2800—4100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.4 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 22 MPG
    (15.1 / 10.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—621 miles (700—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 SDV6
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 39 MPG
    (8.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.4 SDV8
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle P400 3.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 27 MPG
    (12.4 / 8.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 33 MPG / 9.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 13 MPG / 18 L per 100 km
      • best 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 107 MPG / 2.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2267 kg / 4999 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 32%
      • average engine power: 285 kW / 388 hp
      • difference from world average: 3% better
      • max distance with full tank: 2308 miles (3714 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is between 13 MPG and 107 MPG depending on engine:

  • P400e — 74 to 107 MPG
  • 4.4 V8 — 22 to 31 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 30 to 37 MPG
  • 5.0 V8 — 13 to 25 MPG
  • SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 — 13 to 24 MPG
  • 3.0 SDV6 — 27 to 39 MPG
  • 4.4 SDV8 — 22 to 32 MPG
  • P400 3.0 — 19 to 28 MPG


    2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio

    The 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • P400e — 30 kg/mpg
  • 4.4 V8 — 89 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 66 kg/mpg
  • 5.0 V8 — 125 kg/mpg
  • SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 — 139 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 SDV6 — 73 kg/mpg
  • 4.4 SDV8 — 96 kg/mpg
  • P400 3.0 — 103 kg/mpg


    2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2017 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 161% better than the world average consumption.

  • P400e is 161% more economical than average car
  • 4.4 V8 is 13% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 6% more economical than average car
  • 5.0 V8 is 41% less economical than average car
  • SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 SDV6 is 3% less economical than average car
  • 4.4 SDV8 is 19% less economical than average car
  • P400 3.0 is 31% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2017 Land Rover Range Rover IV (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    P400e 74 / 107 MPG
    (3.2 / 2.2 L per 100 km)     		9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 161% better 1740—2548 miles
    (2800—4100 km)     		0.6 L per 100 km / person
    4.4 V8 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 13% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 30 / 37 MPG
    (7.8 / 6.4 L per 100 km)     		3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 6% better 684—808 miles
    (1100—1300 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km / person
    5.0 V8 13 / 25 MPG
    (17.9 / 9.6 L per 100 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 41% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		2.5 L per 100 km / person
    SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 9.9 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 373—621 miles
    (600—1000 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 SDV6 27 / 39 MPG
    (8.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km)     		3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 621—870 miles
    (1000—1400 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person
    4.4 SDV8 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 19% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)     		1.8 L per 100 km / person
    P400 3.0 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 559—746 miles
    (900—1200 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2017 Land Rover Range Rover IV (facelift 2017) MPG

    Vehicle P400e
    Consumption (city / highway) 74 / 107 MPG
    (3.2 / 2.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 161% better
    Driving range (full tank) 1740—2548 miles (2800—4100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 0.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.4 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 31 MPG
    (10.8 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 13% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 30 / 37 MPG
    (7.8 / 6.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 6% better
    Driving range (full tank) 684—808 miles (1100—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.4 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 25 MPG
    (17.9 / 9.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 41% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle SVAutobiography Dynamic 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 24 MPG
    (18 / 9.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—621 miles (600—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 SDV6
    Consumption (city / highway) 27 / 39 MPG
    (8.7 / 6.1 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 621—870 miles (1000—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.4 SDV8
    Consumption (city / highway) 22 / 32 MPG
    (10.6 / 7.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 19% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle P400 3.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 19 / 28 MPG
    (12.2 / 8.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—746 miles (900—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 30 MPG / 14.8 L per 100 km
      • worst 2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 11 MPG / 20.6 L per 100 km
      • best 2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 24 MPG / 9.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2413 kg / 5321 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 54%
      • average engine power: 375 kW / 510 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 473 miles (761 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is 24 MPG on engine:

  • 5.0 V8 — 11 to 24 MPG


    2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio

    The 2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 5.0 V8 — 142 kg/mpg


    2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2014 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 5.0 V8 is 47% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2014 Land Rover Range Rover IV Long MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    5.0 V8 11 / 24 MPG
    (20.6 / 9.9 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 311—684 miles
    (500—1100 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2014 Land Rover Range Rover IV Long MPG

    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 24 MPG
    (20.6 / 9.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—684 miles (500—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 30 MPG / 9.2 L per 100 km
      • worst 2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 13 MPG / 18 L per 100 km
      • best 2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 37 MPG / 6.3 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2160 kg / 4763 lbs
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 25%
      • average engine power: 233 kW / 316 hp
      • difference from world average: 6% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 1020 miles (1641 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 8 / 10

    2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is between 13 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:

  • 4.4 V8 — 20 to 31 MPG
  • 3.0 SD V6 — 35 to 37 MPG
  • 5.0 V8 — 13 to 25 MPG
  • 3.0 V6 — 28 to 34 MPG


    2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio

    The 2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 4.4 V8 — 87 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 SD V6 — 65 kg/mpg
  • 5.0 V8 — 122 kg/mpg
  • 3.0 V6 — 70 kg/mpg


    2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2013 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 16% better than the world average consumption.

  • 4.4 V8 is 16% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 SD V6 is 16% more economical than average car
  • 5.0 V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 3.0 V6 is 3% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2013 Land Rover Range Rover IV MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    4.4 V8 20 / 31 MPG
    (11.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% worse 559—870 miles
    (900—1400 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 SD V6 35 / 37 MPG
    (6.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km)     		3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 16% better 746—808 miles
    (1200—1300 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km / person
    5.0 V8 13 / 25 MPG
    (18 / 9.5 L per 100 km)     		1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 373—684 miles
    (600—1100 km)     		2.6 L per 100 km / person
    3.0 V6 28 / 34 MPG
    (8.5 / 7 L per 100 km)     		2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg 3% worse 621—746 miles
    (1000—1200 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2013 Land Rover Range Rover IV MPG

    Vehicle 4.4 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 31 MPG
    (11.5 / 7.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—870 miles (900—1400 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 SD V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 35 / 37 MPG
    (6.7 / 6.3 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 3.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 16% better
    Driving range (full tank) 746—808 miles (1200—1300 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 5.0 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 25 MPG
    (18 / 9.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—684 miles (600—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.6 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.0 V6
    Consumption (city / highway) 28 / 34 MPG
    (8.5 / 7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 3% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 621—746 miles (1000—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 2009 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 27 MPG / 12.6 L per 100 km
      • worst 2009 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 11 MPG / 20.8 L per 100 km
      • best 2009 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 29 MPG / 8.2 L per 100 km
      • body type: SUV
      • difference highway / city: 36%
      • average engine power: 270 kW / 367 hp
      • difference from world average: 16% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 694 miles (1117 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2009 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2009 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is between 11 MPG and 29 MPG depending on engine:

  • 5.0 LR V8 — 11 to 24 MPG
  • 4.4 LR TD V8 — 20 to 29 MPG
  • 3.6 LR TD V8 — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 5.0 LR V8 — 14 to 20 MPG


    2009 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2009 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 5.0 LR V8 is 47% less economical than average car
  • 4.4 LR TD V8 is 22% less economical than average car
  • 3.6 LR TD V8 is 34% less economical than average car
  • 5.0 LR V8 is 50% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2009 Land Rover Range Rover III (facelift 2009) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    5.0 LR V8 11 / 24 MPG
    (20.8 / 10 L per 100 km)     		- 47% worse 311—621 miles
    (500—1000 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km / person
    4.4 LR TD V8 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.5 / 8.2 L per 100 km)     		- 22% worse 559—746 miles
    (900—1200 km)     		1.9 L per 100 km / person
    3.6 LR TD V8 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km)     		- 34% worse 497—746 miles
    (800—1200 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km / person
    5.0 LR V8 14 / 20 MPG
    (17.1 / 11.9 L per 100 km)     		- 50% worse 373—559 miles
    (600—900 km)     		3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2009 Land Rover Range Rover III (facelift 2009) MPG

    Vehicle 5.0 LR V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 24 MPG
    (20.8 / 10 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—621 miles (500—1000 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.4 LR TD V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 20 / 29 MPG
    (11.5 / 8.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 22% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 559—746 miles (900—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 1.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.6 LR TD V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—746 miles (800—1200 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.2 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 5.0 LR V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 20 MPG
    (17.1 / 11.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio -
    Difference from world average consumption 50% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 373—559 miles (600—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 26 MPG / 15.1 L per 100 km
      • worst 2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 11 MPG / 22.4 L per 100 km
      • best 2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 26 MPG / 9.2 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2560 kg / 5645 lbs
      • body type: off-road vehicle
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 236 kW / 320 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 577 miles (929 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is between 11 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:

  • 4.4 i V8 32V — 11 to 21 MPG
  • 3.6 TD 32V — 16 to 26 MPG
  • 4.2 i V8 32V SC — 11 to 19 MPG


    2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio

    The 2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 4.4 i V8 32V — 178 kg/mpg
  • 3.6 TD 32V — 125 kg/mpg
  • 4.2 i V8 32V SC — 183 kg/mpg


    2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2005 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 56% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 4.4 i V8 32V is 56% less economical than average car
  • 3.6 TD 32V is 34% less economical than average car
  • 4.2 i V8 32V SC is 56% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2005 Land Rover Range Rover III (facelift 2005) MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    4.4 i V8 32V 11 / 21 MPG
    (21.2 / 11.4 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 56% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		3.3 L per 100 km / person
    3.6 TD 32V 16 / 26 MPG
    (14.4 / 9.2 L per 100 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    4.2 i V8 32V SC 11 / 19 MPG
    (22.4 / 12.2 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 56% worse 311—559 miles
    (500—900 km)     		3.5 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2005 Land Rover Range Rover III (facelift 2005) MPG

    Vehicle 4.4 i V8 32V
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 21 MPG
    (21.2 / 11.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 56% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.6 TD 32V
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 26 MPG
    (14.4 / 9.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.2 i V8 32V SC
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 19 MPG
    (22.4 / 12.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 56% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—559 miles (500—900 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.5 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 26 MPG / 14.4 L per 100 km
      • worst 2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 11 MPG / 22.2 L per 100 km
      • best 2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 25 MPG / 9.4 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2510 kg / 5535 lbs
      • body type: off-road vehicle
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 170 kW / 232 hp
      • difference from world average: 19% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 550 miles (885 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is between 11 MPG and 25 MPG depending on engine:

  • 2.9 TD 24V — 16 to 25 MPG
  • 4.4 V8 — 11 to 19 MPG


    2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio

    The 2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 2.9 TD 24V — 119 kg/mpg
  • 4.4 V8 — 167 kg/mpg


    2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 2002 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 53% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 2.9 TD 24V is 34% less economical than average car
  • 4.4 V8 is 53% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 2002 Land Rover Range Rover III MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    2.9 TD 24V 16 / 25 MPG
    (14.4 / 9.4 L per 100 km)     		2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 34% worse 435—684 miles
    (700—1100 km)     		2.3 L per 100 km / person
    4.4 V8 11 / 19 MPG
    (22.2 / 12.6 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 53% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		3.2 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 2002 Land Rover Range Rover III MPG

    Vehicle 2.9 TD 24V
    Consumption (city / highway) 16 / 25 MPG
    (14.4 / 9.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 34% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 435—684 miles (700—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.3 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.4 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 19 MPG
    (22.2 / 12.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 53% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.2 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 24 MPG / 16.5 L per 100 km
      • worst 1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 10 MPG / 23.9 L per 100 km
      • best 1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 26 MPG / 8.9 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2120 kg / 4675 lbs
      • body type: off-road vehicle
      • difference highway / city: 41%
      • average engine power: 140 kW / 191 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 586 miles (943 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is between 10 MPG and 26 MPG depending on engine:

  • 4.0 — 10 to 19 MPG
  • 2.5 D — 18 to 26 MPG
  • 4.6 V8 HSE — 10 to 14 MPG
  • 4.6 — 10 to 19 MPG


    1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio

    The 1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 4.0 — 163 kg/mpg
  • 2.5 D — 96 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 V8 HSE — 185 kg/mpg
  • 4.6 — 163 kg/mpg


    1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1995 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 63% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 4.0 is 60% less economical than average car
  • 2.5 D is 31% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 V8 HSE is 63% less economical than average car
  • 4.6 is 60% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1995 Land Rover Range Rover II MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    4.0 10 / 19 MPG
    (22.5 / 12.6 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 60% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		3.5 L per 100 km / person
    2.5 D 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km)     		2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 31% worse 497—684 miles
    (800—1100 km)     		2.1 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 V8 HSE 10 / 14 MPG
    (22.9 / 16.4 L per 100 km)     		1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg 63% worse 249—373 miles
    (400—600 km)     		3.9 L per 100 km / person
    4.6 10 / 19 MPG
    (23.9 / 12.2 L per 100 km)     		1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg 60% worse 249—497 miles
    (400—800 km)     		3.6 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1995 Land Rover Range Rover II MPG

    Vehicle 4.0
    Consumption (city / highway) 10 / 19 MPG
    (22.5 / 12.6 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 60% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.5 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 2.5 D
    Consumption (city / highway) 18 / 26 MPG
    (12.8 / 8.9 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 31% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 497—684 miles (800—1100 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.1 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6 V8 HSE
    Consumption (city / highway) 10 / 14 MPG
    (22.9 / 16.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 63% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—373 miles (400—600 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.9 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.6
    Consumption (city / highway) 10 / 19 MPG
    (23.9 / 12.2 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 60% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—497 miles (400—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3.6 L per 100 km / person

    Quick Notes on Land Rover Range Rover MPG

      • average 1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 24 MPG / 14.7 L per 100 km
      • worst 1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 11 MPG / 21.6 L per 100 km
      • best 1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: 22 MPG / 10.5 L per 100 km
      • body weight: 2075 kg / 4575 lbs
      • body type: off-road vehicle
      • difference highway / city: 38%
      • average engine power: 140 kW / 191 hp
      • difference from world average: 25% worse
      • max distance with full tank: 380 miles (612 km)
      • Fuelson rating: 6 / 10

    1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG (Miles per Gallon)

    1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is between 11 MPG and 22 MPG depending on engine:

  • 3.9 V8 — 13 to 22 MPG
  • 3.9 Vogue SEI — 14 to 21 MPG
  • 4.3 Vogue LSE — 11 to 20 MPG


    1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio

    The 1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:

  • 3.9 V8 — 110 kg/mpg
  • 3.9 Vogue SEI — 111 kg/mpg
  • 4.3 Vogue LSE — 130 kg/mpg


    1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG: difference from world average

    We calculated that 1970 Land Rover Range Rover MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.

  • 3.9 V8 is 44% less economical than average car
  • 3.9 Vogue SEI is 47% less economical than average car
  • 4.3 Vogue LSE is 50% less economical than average car


    • Additional Details On 1970 Land Rover Range Rover I MPG

    Vehicle Consumption (city / highway) Consumption to weight ratio Difference from world average consumption Driving range (full tank) Consumption per passenger
    3.9 V8 13 / 22 MPG
    (18.2 / 10.5 L per 100 km)     		1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg 44% worse 311—497 miles
    (500—800 km)     		2.7 L per 100 km / person
    3.9 Vogue SEI 14 / 21 MPG
    (16.3 / 11.4 L per 100 km)     		1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg 47% worse 311—435 miles
    (500—700 km)     		2.8 L per 100 km / person
    4.3 Vogue LSE 11 / 20 MPG
    (21.6 / 11.7 L per 100 km)     		1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg 50% worse 249—435 miles
    (400—700 km)     		3 L per 100 km / person

    Additional Details On 1970 Land Rover Range Rover I MPG

    Vehicle 3.9 V8
    Consumption (city / highway) 13 / 22 MPG
    (18.2 / 10.5 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 44% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—497 miles (500—800 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.7 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 3.9 Vogue SEI
    Consumption (city / highway) 14 / 21 MPG
    (16.3 / 11.4 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 47% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 311—435 miles (500—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 2.8 L per 100 km / person
    Vehicle 4.3 Vogue LSE
    Consumption (city / highway) 11 / 20 MPG
    (21.6 / 11.7 L per 100 km)
    Consumption to weight ratio 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg
    Difference from world average consumption 50% worse
    Driving range (full tank) 249—435 miles (400—700 km)
    Consumption per passenger 3 L per 100 km / person

    Related Posts

    Fuel Economy - Our Ratings