2019 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG is between 23 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 2019 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MPI |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
GT 1.6 T-GDI |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 MPI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 1.6 T-GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2019 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG is between 23 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 2019 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2019 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG is up to 9% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MPI |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
GT 1.6 T-GDI |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 MPI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
41 MPG
(10.2 / 5.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | GT 1.6 T-GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(8.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG is between 21 MPG and 57 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 CRDi |
29
/
51 MPG
(8.2 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 CRDi |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
559—808 miles
(900—1300 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
39 MPG
(10.9 / 6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11.3 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
51 MPG
(8.2 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 CRDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
57 MPG
(6.3 / 4.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—808 miles (900—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG is between 23 MPG and 59 MPG depending on engine:
The 2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2004 Kia Cerato (Forte) MPG is up to 50% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
26
/
43 MPG
(9.1 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.2 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 CRDi |
29
/
51 MPG
(8.2 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
435—746 miles
(700—1200 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.5 CRDi |
37
/
59 MPG
(6.4 / 4 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% better |
559—870 miles
(900—1400 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
43 MPG
(9.1 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
40 MPG
(10.2 / 5.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.5 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
29
/
51 MPG
(8.2 / 4.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—746 miles (700—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.5 CRDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
37
/
59 MPG
(6.4 / 4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 559—870 miles (900—1400 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |