2015 Kia Carnival MPG is between 16 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2015 Kia Carnival MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2015 Kia Carnival MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 CRDi |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% worse |
-
|
1 L per 100 km / person |
3.3 V6 |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.9 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
-
|
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 CRDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
37 MPG
(9.7 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
22 MPG
(14.9 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | - |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2010 Kia Carnival MPG is between 18 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 2010 Kia Carnival MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2010 Kia Carnival MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 V6 16V |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.3 / 7 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 19% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km / person |
3.8i V6 |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
34 MPG
(12.3 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 19% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
25 MPG
(13.1 / 9.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Kia Carnival MPG is between 16 MPG and 37 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Kia Carnival MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Kia Carnival MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7i V6 |
16
/
27 MPG
(15 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.9 CRDi |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
497—808 miles
(800—1300 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.7i V6 |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
27 MPG
(15 / 8.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 CRDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
37 MPG
(10.2 / 6.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—808 miles (800—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2001 Kia Carnival MPG is between 17 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2001 Kia Carnival MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2001 Kia Carnival MPG is up to 31% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 CRDI |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—684 miles
(700—1100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i V6 24V |
17
/
26 MPG
(14.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i V6 |
17
/
26 MPG
(14.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 CRDI |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
36 MPG
(11 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—684 miles (700—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(14.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
26 MPG
(14.1 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Kia Carnival MPG is between 16 MPG and 34 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Kia Carnival MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Kia Carnival MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 TD |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
373—684 miles
(600—1100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5i V6 24V |
16
/
29 MPG
(15 / 8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.9 TD |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
34 MPG
(12 / 7 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—684 miles (600—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 24V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(15 / 8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |