2013 Kia Carens MPG is between 22 MPG and 52 MPG depending on engine:
The 2013 Kia Carens MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2013 Kia Carens MPG is up to 53% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 16V CRDi |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% better |
497—684 miles
(800—1100 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
1.7 CRDI |
44
/
52 MPG
(5.3 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 53% better |
684—808 miles
(1100—1300 km) |
0.7 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 16V GDI |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
373—621 miles
(600—1000 km) |
1 L per 100 km / person |
2.0 16V GDI |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 16V CRDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
31
/
46 MPG
(7.7 / 5.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—684 miles (800—1100 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.7 CRDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
44
/
52 MPG
(5.3 / 4.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 3.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 53% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 684—808 miles (1100—1300 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
25
/
41 MPG
(9.3 / 5.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—621 miles (600—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V GDI |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
37 MPG
(10.6 / 6.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.9 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.1 L per 100 km / person |
2006 Kia Carens MPG is between 22 MPG and 45 MPG depending on engine:
The 2006 Kia Carens MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2006 Kia Carens MPG is up to 13% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRDi |
30
/
45 MPG
(7.8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 13% better |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
0.9 L per 100 km / person |
2.0i 16V |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 16% worse |
373—559 miles
(600—900 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
30
/
45 MPG
(7.8 / 5.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 13% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 0.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
36 MPG
(10.8 / 6.6 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 16% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 373—559 miles (600—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1999 Kia Carens MPG is between 22 MPG and 43 MPG depending on engine:
The 1999 Kia Carens MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1999 Kia Carens MPG is up to 22% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRDi |
22
/
43 MPG
(10.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 22% worse |
311—621 miles
(500—1000 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km / person |
1.8i 16V |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.2 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
1.6 i 16V |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.6 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
43 MPG
(10.9 / 5.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 22% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—621 miles (500—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
35 MPG
(10.2 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
22
/
35 MPG
(10.6 / 6.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.2 L per 100 km / person |