2018 Jeep Wrangler MPG is between 17 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2018 Jeep Wrangler MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2018 Jeep Wrangler MPG is up to 37% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6 V6 Rubicon |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 Rubicon |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 6% worse |
497—746 miles
(800—1200 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km / person |
2.2 Sahara |
26
/
36 MPG
(9 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 0% |
435—621 miles
(700—1000 km) |
1.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6 V6 Rubicon |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.8 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 Rubicon |
Consumption (city / highway) |
23
/
36 MPG
(10.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.8 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 6% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—746 miles (800—1200 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.6 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.2 Sahara |
Consumption (city / highway) |
26
/
36 MPG
(9 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.7 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 0% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—621 miles (700—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.9 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Jeep Wrangler MPG is between 14 MPG and 36 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Jeep Wrangler MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Jeep Wrangler MPG is up to 3% better than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8i V6 Sport |
16
/
29 MPG
(15.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—559 miles
(500—900 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
3.8i V6 Sahara |
17
/
19 MPG
(13.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
3.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 CRDi Sport |
28
/
36 MPG
(8.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 3% better |
497—621 miles
(800—1000 km) |
1.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.6i V6 12V Sahara |
15
/
27 MPG
(15.6 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 CRDi Sahara |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 9% worse |
435—559 miles
(700—900 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.8i V6 Rubicon |
14
/
27 MPG
(16.4 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.9 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 Sport |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
29 MPG
(15.1 / 8.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—559 miles (500—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 Sahara |
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
19 MPG
(13.8 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRDi Sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
28
/
36 MPG
(8.3 / 6.5 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 3% better |
Driving range (full tank) | 497—621 miles (800—1000 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 1.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6i V6 12V Sahara |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
27 MPG
(15.6 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRDi Sahara |
Consumption (city / highway) |
24
/
33 MPG
(9.7 / 7.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 9% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 435—559 miles (700—900 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 Rubicon |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
27 MPG
(16.4 / 8.8 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.9 L per 100 km / person |
2007 Jeep Wrangler MPG is between 14 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:
The 2007 Jeep Wrangler MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 2007 Jeep Wrangler MPG is up to 47% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.8i V6 12V Sahara |
15
/
19 MPG
(15.7 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.8 L per 100 km / person |
3.6i V6 12V Sport |
15
/
26 MPG
(16.1 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
2.8 CRDi |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.6 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 25% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
3.8i V6 12V |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.7 / 9 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
249—497 miles
(400—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 12V Sahara |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
19 MPG
(15.7 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.6i V6 12V Sport |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
26 MPG
(16.1 / 9.2 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.8 CRDi |
Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
28 MPG
(12.6 / 8.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 25% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 3.8i V6 12V |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
26 MPG
(16.7 / 9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—497 miles (400—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
1997 Jeep Wrangler MPG is between 14 MPG and 28 MPG depending on engine:
The 1997 Jeep Wrangler MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1997 Jeep Wrangler MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V |
17
/
28 MPG
(14 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 28% worse |
249—435 miles
(400—700 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 i |
16
/
19 MPG
(14.7 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
2.7 L per 100 km / person |
4.0 i Rubicon |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—311 miles
(400—500 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i |
16
/
26 MPG
(15 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i Soft Top |
16
/
26 MPG
(15 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
28 MPG
(14 / 8.3 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 28% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—435 miles (400—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
19 MPG
(14.7 / 12.4 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.7 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 i Rubicon |
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
18 MPG
(16.8 / 13.1 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—311 miles (400—500 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
26 MPG
(15 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i Soft Top |
Consumption (city / highway) |
16
/
26 MPG
(15 / 8.9 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.2 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3 L per 100 km / person |
1987 Jeep Wrangler MPG is between 14 MPG and 21 MPG depending on engine:
The 1987 Jeep Wrangler MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1987 Jeep Wrangler MPG is up to 50% worse than the world average consumption.
Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.0 i |
14
/
20 MPG
(17.3 / 12 L per 100 km) |
1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 50% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
3.8 L per 100 km / person |
2.5 i |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.8 / 11 L per 100 km) |
1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 47% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
3.4 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 4.0 i |
---|---|
Consumption (city / highway) |
14
/
20 MPG
(17.3 / 12 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 50% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.8 L per 100 km / person |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
21 MPG
(15.8 / 11 L per 100 km) |
Consumption to weight ratio | 1.1 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
Difference from world average consumption | 47% worse |
Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
Consumption per passenger | 3.4 L per 100 km / person |