1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG is between 17 MPG and 24 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 i V6 24V 2WD |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.9 / 10.1 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 37% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.2 i 16V 2WD |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
311—373 miles
(500—600 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.2 i V6 24V 4WD |
17
/
22 MPG
(13.9 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
249—373 miles
(400—600 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V 2WD |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
23 MPG
(13.9 / 10.1 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 37% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.4 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V 2WD |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
20
/
24 MPG
(11.8 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.6 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—373 miles (500—600 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V 4WD |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
22 MPG
(13.9 / 10.7 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 249—373 miles (400—600 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG is between 18 MPG and 24 MPG depending on engine:
The 1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG is up to 41% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 i V6 24V L 4WD |
18
/
20 MPG
(13.1 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
373—435 miles
(600—700 km) |
2.5 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.2 i L 2WD |
21
/
24 MPG
(11.2 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 31% worse |
435—497 miles
(700—800 km) |
2.1 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V L 4WD |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
18
/
20 MPG
(13.1 / 11.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—435 miles (600—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.5 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.2 i L 2WD |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
21
/
24 MPG
(11.2 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.5 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 31% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 435—497 miles (700—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.1 L per 100 km / person |
1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG is 23 MPG on engine:
The 1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1998 Isuzu Rodeo MPG is up to 34% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 i 16V 2WD |
19
/
23 MPG
(12.4 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 34% worse |
311—435 miles
(500—700 km) |
2.3 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.2 i 16V 2WD |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
19
/
23 MPG
(12.4 / 10.2 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 34% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—435 miles (500—700 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.3 L per 100 km / person |
1990 Isuzu Rodeo MPG is between 15 MPG and 24 MPG depending on engine:
The 1990 Isuzu Rodeo MPG to weight ratio is shown in the graph:
We calculated that 1990 Isuzu Rodeo MPG is up to 44% worse than the world average consumption.
| Vehicle | Consumption (city / highway) | Consumption to weight ratio | Difference from world average consumption | Driving range (full tank) | Consumption per passenger |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 i 4WD LS |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.2 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| 3.2 i S 2WD |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.2 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 44% worse |
311—497 miles
(500—800 km) |
2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| 2.6 i S |
17
/
24 MPG
(14 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg | 41% worse |
373—497 miles
(600—800 km) |
2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 i 4WD LS |
|---|---|
| Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.2 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.4 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 3.2 i S 2WD |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
15
/
22 MPG
(15.2 / 10.6 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 44% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 311—497 miles (500—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2.2 L per 100 km / person |
| Vehicle | 2.6 i S |
| Consumption (city / highway) |
17
/
24 MPG
(14 / 9.8 L per 100 km) |
| Consumption to weight ratio | 1.3 L per 100 km to 100 kg |
| Difference from world average consumption | 41% worse |
| Driving range (full tank) | 373—497 miles (600—800 km) |
| Consumption per passenger | 2 L per 100 km / person |
